Flint
K-12 AI tutoring and teacher tools with published per-school pricing
Overview
Flint is a K-12 AI platform pairing student-facing personalized tutoring with teacher tools for lesson planning, custom rubrics and classroom insights across math, English, science and more. LMS/SIS and Google/Microsoft SSO built in; reports 650,000+ daily teachers and students.
Pricing
Pricing shown for reference only. These figures reflect RECATOOLS research as of 12 Jul 2026 and may be out of date or incomplete. This is not financial or purchasing advice — always confirm the current price on the provider’s official website before making any decision.
- Core AI tutoring
- Teacher tools
- Basic classroom features
- SIS/LMS integration
- School-wide data analytics
- Dedicated customer success manager
- SIS/LMS integration
- School-wide data analytics
- Dedicated customer success manager
- SIS/LMS integration
- School-wide data analytics
- Dedicated customer success manager
- All paid-plan features
- Reduced per-seat pricing at scale
What you can produce with Flint
- Personalized AI tutoring across math, English, science and more
- Essay writing feedback with custom rubrics
- Math accuracy verification and formula/graphing tools
- Teacher-facing lesson planning and class-wide summaries
- Real-time monitoring, content guardrails and auto-flagging
- LMS/SIS integrations plus Google and Microsoft SSO
- Text-to-speech/speech-to-text in 50+ languages
- FERPA, COPPA and GDPR-compliant data handling
ASEAN Perspective
Flint in Southeast Asia
ASEAN-region availability and pricing notes coming soon. Drop the editorial team a note via /contact/ if you can supply local context (Singapore/Malaysia/Indonesia/Thailand/Vietnam).
Flint's strongest signal is adoption pattern, not feature list: districts describe it as the tool they've actually approved district-wide, which matters more in K-12 than almost any other buying criterion given how many schools block AI tools outright. It runs on Claude with added guardrails for grading, math verification and content controls, and the teacher-facing side (custom rubrics, class-wide summaries, flagging) is arguably the more differentiated half of the product — plenty of AI tutors exist, fewer give teachers this much visibility into what's happening.
Pricing is genuinely published, which is rare in this category: free up to 80 users, then tiered by school size from $3,000/year up to custom Enterprise pricing above 500 users. That transparency is a real point in its favor for budget-strapped schools comparing options. The one recurring gap in feedback is subject coverage — reviewers note it leans humanities-heavy with fewer science-lab-specific templates. Good fit for districts wanting an approved, safety-first AI tool with teacher oversight built in; less turnkey for STEM-heavy programs wanting subject-specific depth.
What people say
Flint reports powering more than 650,000 teachers and students daily, up from previously reported figures in the 400,000 range — rapid growth for a K-12-focused AI platform in a category where many districts still ban AI tools outright. The platform runs on Claude 4 Sonnet alongside translation and code-based math verification, aimed at keeping tutoring responses accurate rather than just fluent.
District AI Index's 2026 review calls it "one of the best purpose-built K-12 AI tutoring platforms," specifically crediting its safety posture and instructional design — real-time monitoring, content guardrails and curriculum alignment rather than an open-ended chatbot repurposed for schools. Teacher testimonials collected by Flint and third parties describe measurable classroom impact: one teacher reported a student building a self-generated study guide from Flint, another used it to let students self-correct math homework by comparing steps against AI-verified solutions. A district technology help page (D-E) documenting Flint as an officially supported classroom tool reinforces that IT/admin approval, not just teacher enthusiasm, is part of its adoption story.
The most specific critique found: a teacher praised the clean UI but wished for more science-lab-specific templates, describing current content as "heavy on humanities." That's a narrow complaint but a believable gap for a platform whose headline use cases (essay feedback, writing scores) skew language-arts first.
Pricing is unusually transparent for edtech: free for up to 80 users, then $3,000/year (up to 150 users), $4,000/year (up to 250), $6,500/year (up to 500), and custom Enterprise pricing above that. Compliance messaging (FERPA, COPPA, GDPR, no student data used for AI training) is prominent, which is table stakes for any tool selling into K-12 but worth confirming given how much scrutiny district IT teams apply to AI vendors on data handling specifically.
Summary of public user & expert reviews, compiled by RECATOOLS.
About this listing
This entry was compiled from publicly available data including Flint's official website, press releases, documentation, and reputable third-party publications. RECATOOLS is not affiliated with Flint unless explicitly stated.
Third-party AI tools update their pricing, features, availability, and policies frequently. Information here may be outdated by the time you read this — we make reasonable efforts to keep listings current, but cannot guarantee absolute accuracy.
For the latest details, please refer to Flint directly →
Spotted something out of date? Suggest an update →
Alternatives to Flint
More in Education
