SAN BRUNO, Calif., 11 AUG 2026 — Starting next February, new YouTube creators will need to double their watch time to earn anything from their videos.
YouTube announced on 10 August that applicants to its Partner Program will need 8,000 qualified public watch hours over 365 days, up from 4,000, or 20 million qualified Shorts views over 90 days, up from 10 million. The 1,000-subscriber requirement stays. The changes take effect on 1 February 2027, and it is the first major overhaul of these thresholds since 2018.
What is changing
Anyone already in the programme is grandfathered and does not have to meet the new numbers.
The recurring requirement is the bigger change
The doubling will get the attention, and the quieter clause will matter more to people already earning.
Creators taking money from the Shorts revenue pool will need to keep hitting 10 million Shorts views every 90 days. Fall below it and you stay in the Partner Program but stop earning from Shorts until you cross back over.
That converts a one-time entry test into a continuing performance test — one that can cut off your income in a quarter when you were ill, moved house, or simply published less.
[Sentence deleted]
Why YouTube says it is doing this
The company points to its own scale: more than 200 billion Shorts views a day, and over a billion hours a day watched on television screens.
Read literally, that is an argument that the old thresholds were set for a smaller platform. Four thousand watch hours meant something different when the denominator was smaller, and a bar that never moves gets easier every year purely because the platform grows.
The logic is sound, as far as it goes. But it indexes the entry requirement to YouTube's growth, not to what a creator needs to be viable. A threshold that rises with total platform volume asks new entrants to clear a bar set by the platform's success, not by their own.
Who this actually affects
Nobody currently earning loses access. This change affects people who have not qualified yet — the ones eighteen months into building something on a 4,000-hour target who now find the goalposts at 8,000.
The practical consequence is a longer unpaid period. Whatever the median time to reach 4,000 hours is, the time to reach 8,000 is longer than double it for most channels, because growth compounds and early growth is the slowest part.
One argument is that this is fine: ad revenue at this level is small, and a higher bar might filter out low-quality channels. The counterargument is that the people most affected have the least capacity to absorb another six months of working for nothing.
What it costs in practice
To get a feel for what these thresholds mean in practice:
Eight thousand watch hours in a year is 480,000 minutes of somebody watching. A channel publishing weekly ten-minute videos needs, very roughly, 48,000 full views across the year to clear it — and nobody watches to the end, so the real figure is higher.
Twenty million Shorts views in ninety days demands a repeated, sustained hit rate, not a loyal audience. It is the route that rewards volume and algorithmic favour over a dedicated following, which makes the recurring requirement particularly harsh.
Neither number is unreachable. Both are now roughly a year further away for somebody starting today, and that year is unpaid.
What to watch
Will the recurring Shorts requirement be applied more widely? If a continuing-performance condition proves administratively convenient, there is no structural reason it has to stay confined to Shorts.
Whether other platforms follow. Monetisation thresholds tend to move together, and this is the first change to these particular numbers in eight years.
And will YouTube say how many creators this change affects? It has the number but has not shared it — the one figure that would let anyone assess the policy's real impact, not just its direction.
View author profile → · Editorial policy
