Science 4 min read

Antarctica's Net Ice Loss This Century Is Locked In, Even With Deep Emission Cuts

How much Antarctica will add to sea level is a major unknown. A new study finds its ice loss this century is very likely locked in, and extra snowfall will not offset it.

Nadia Rahim
Data & Statistics Analyst
Published 1 Oct 2026, 4:30 PM (SGT)
Share:
The edge of an ice shelf meeting the sea, with broken ice floating in front The edge of an ice shelf meeting the sea, with broken ice floating in front Photo by Francesco Ungaro on Pexels
Advertisement

1 OCT 2026 — How much Antarctica will add to the oceans is one of the biggest unknowns in sea-level forecasts. A study published in Nature Geoscience on 30 September narrows it, finding that the continent will very likely lose more ice than it gains this century even if the world cuts emissions sharply. Under very high emissions, the ice sheet could add up to 25.4 centimetres to global sea level by 2100.

The result also weighs in on a long-running disagreement among ice-sheet models over whether extra snowfall in a warmer climate could offset ice lost to a warming ocean. It finds that it cannot.

Why Antarctica is hard to forecast

A projection of Antarctica's contribution starts with an emissions scenario. Climate models turn that into ocean and air temperatures, and ice-sheet models then work out what those temperatures do to the floating ice shelves and to ice sliding over the bedrock beneath. Each stage feeds the next, so differences multiply.

The paper notes that in the main international comparison of ice-sheet models, projections for 2100 under very high emissions ranged from Antarctica lowering sea level by more than 7 centimetres to raising it by more than 40.

≥0.92Probability Antarctica has net ice loss this century, even with deep emission cuts
15.7 cmMedian sea-level rise from Antarctica by 2100, very high emissions
25.4 cm95th-percentile estimate in the same scenario
2002 onwardSatellite gravity data used to rule out unrealistic futures

How the team narrowed it down

Researchers from institutions in Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand and the United States trained a machine-learning model on that archive of simulations. It mapped each result to the assumptions behind it, and could then produce in a fraction of a second what took the original models days.

That let them run millions of combinations and keep only the ones that matched satellite measurements since 2002, which weigh the ice sheet through tiny changes in Earth's gravity. "Only scenarios that were able to match what the satellites have seen since 2002 made the cut," the researchers wrote in The Conversation.

What the surviving scenarios say

The study estimates at least a 0.92 probability that Antarctica is committed to net ice loss this century, even under aggressive emission cuts, including a path consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C. Higher emissions very likely mean more loss by 2100.

Advertisement

The upper estimate comes from a cascade the authors see under very high emissions. Warmer water thins floating ice shelves until they break up, and once they are gone the glaciers behind them speed up towards the sea. That is how the 95th-percentile figure reaches 25.4 centimetres; the median in the same scenario is 15.7.

The team tested more than 20 physical assumptions. Forecasts would sharpen most, the authors say, with a better grasp of how ice shelves react to a warming ocean and how ice slides over bedrock, along with how fast the ocean and air around Antarctica warm.

What is still missing

The archive models leave out some processes, including ice cracking and breaking and changes in the lakes and rivers under the ice, so the machine-learning model cannot learn about them. "Our study is far from the final word," the authors write.

What it means for coasts

Antarctica is only one source of sea-level rise, alongside Greenland, mountain glaciers and warming seawater. For low-lying coastal cities, including many in Southeast Asia, the finding narrows one of the largest uncertainties planners face and points toward more rise rather than less.

Advertisement
Nadia Rahim
Data & Statistics Analyst

Nadia Rahim covers statistics, data literacy, measurement, and how published numbers get misread for RECATOOLS.

View author profile → · Editorial policy

About this byline Nadia Rahim is a RECATOOLS editorial persona for statistics and data-literacy coverage. Articles are produced and reviewed under RECATOOLS editorial supervision.

Corrections policy

Advertisement