Greptile

AI pull-request reviewer with full-codebase context

Code & Dev Tools Freemium Has API
Researched · Published · Reviewed
RECATOOLS Score
7.5 / 10
Capability
8
Value for money
7
Ease of use
7
ASEAN readiness
6
API quality
7
Founded
2023
HQ
San Francisco, California, USA

Overview

Greptile indexes a repository into a graph of files, functions and dependencies, then reviews each pull request with that context to catch bugs outside the diff. 2026 brought a free Starter plan, TREX sandboxed test runs (beta), a default-on security agent, the v5 multi-agent engine and Plus and Apex deeper review tiers.

Advertisement

Pricing

Pricing shown for reference only. These figures reflect RECATOOLS research as of 12 Oct 2026 and may be out of date or incomplete. This is not financial or purchasing advice — always confirm the current price on the provider’s official website before making any decision.

Starter
Free
For individual developers
  • 50 credits a month
  • 1 active developer
  • Unlimited repositories
Enterprise
Custom
Contact sales
  • Self-host in your own infrastructure
  • SSO and SAML
  • GitHub Enterprise, GitLab Self-Managed and Bitbucket Data Center
  • Custom DPA, terms and invoicing
Open source
Free
Application required
  • Qualified non-commercial projects with an OSI-approved licence
Startups
50% off
Pre-Series A, under $2M revenue
  • Review credits: Base 1, Plus 3, Apex 10

Use cases

Full-codebase PR review Architectural feedback Cross-file analysis

What you can produce with Greptile

  • Every new pull request on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket reviewed with comments that account for code outside the diff
  • Breaking changes in shared helpers caught before merge, with affected call sites traced across modules
  • Base, Plus or Apex review depth chosen per pull request, or set by rules for large or risky changes
  • Targeted tests written and run in a sandbox by TREX (beta), with logs attached to failing findings
  • A default-on security review combining Opengrep scanning, dependency checks and AI exploit detection
  • Team rules in a .greptile/ folder or imported CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md files, enforced on every pull request
  • A free Starter plan for one developer before moving to the $30-per-seat Pro plan
Advertisement
RECATOOLS Verdict

Greptile's edge is context. It indexes the whole repository, so its reviews can flag a change that breaks a caller three modules away, and it learns team conventions from rules files and reactions to its comments. On Martian's independent Code Review Bench it posted the highest precision among the 15 tools on the last-month leaderboard (80.3%, read in October 2026), which answers the old complaint that it was noisy. The 82% catch rate it markets comes from its own 2025 test.

Pricing is credit-based: Pro is $30 per seat a month with 50 credits per seat and $1 per extra credit, and Plus and Apex reviews cost 3 and 10 credits, so heavy use of deep reviews needs modelling. Treat it as a strong first-pass reviewer rather than a merge gate.

Desk research by RECATOOLS from public sources, written with AI assistance — not a hands-on test. How we review

What we found

Greptile is an AI pull-request reviewer built by Tabnam, Inc., a San Francisco company from Y Combinator's Winter 2024 batch, co-founded by Daksh Gupta, Soohoon Choi and Vaishant Kameswaran. It builds a graph of a repository's files, functions and dependencies, then reviews each pull request with that context, so it can flag a change that breaks code outside the diff. In September 2025 it announced a $25 million Series A led by Benchmark; its site now says more than 22,000 teams use it, a vendor figure.

The product has moved quickly in 2026. A free Starter plan for one developer arrived in June, alongside TREX, a beta that writes and runs targeted tests in a sandbox. July added a security agent combining Opengrep scanning, dependency checks and AI review. Version 5 in August split each review across narrowly scoped agents, and Greptile says median review time fell from 5:04 to 2:25. In late September it added Plus and Apex review tiers, which spend three and ten credits for deeper analysis.

The quality evidence needs sorting by source. The often-quoted 82% bug-catch rate comes from Greptile's own July 2025 test of 50 bugs, which an earlier version of this page called independent. Martian's independent Code Review Bench is more useful: on its last-month leaderboard, read in October 2026, Greptile ranked third on F1 at 63.3%, with recall of 52.2% and precision of 80.3%, the highest among the 15 tools shown.

Criticism exists but is thin on volume. One Hacker News commenter in January 2026 called Greptile "pretty much pure noise" after trying it, and disliked the confidence score attached to each pull request. Martian's precision figure suggests that is no longer typical, but noise is still worth testing for.

Pro costs $30 per seat a month with 50 credits per seat and $1 for each extra credit. Teams with large, interconnected codebases should trial it on real pull requests before treating it as a merge gate.

Compiled by RECATOOLS from public sources: vendor documentation and pricing, code repositories and published reporting.

About this listing

Researched on
Published on
Last reviewed

This entry was compiled from publicly available data including Greptile's official website, press releases, documentation, and reputable third-party publications. RECATOOLS is not affiliated with Greptile unless explicitly stated.

Data accuracy

Third-party AI tools update their pricing, features, availability, and policies frequently. Information here may be outdated by the time you read this — we make reasonable efforts to keep listings current, but cannot guarantee absolute accuracy.

For the latest details, please refer to Greptile directly →

Spotted something out of date? Suggest an update →

Advertisement