Greptile vs Sourcegraph Cody
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Greptile
AI pull-request reviewer with full-codebase context
Visit
|
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph's codebase-aware coding assistant, now sold only to enterp...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.5 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Enterprise |
| Free tier | Starter is free: 1 active developer, 50 credits a month, unlimited repositories; free for qualifying non-commercial OSI-licensed projects | — |
| Paid from | Pro from $30/seat/month (50 credits per seat, extra credits $1 each) | $16K minimum annual contract (Sourcegraph Enterprise, AI credits included) |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 200k+ developers |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Maker | — | Sourcegraph |
| Verdict | Greptile's edge is context. It indexes the whole repository, so its reviews can flag a change that breaks a caller three modules away, and it learns team conventions from rules files and reactions to its comments. On Mar... |
Cody's strength was always context: answers grounded in symbols and usages from across an organisation's repositories, not just the open file. That still holds for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers working in VS Code, Jet... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.