Greptile vs Sourcegraph Cody
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Greptile
AI code reviewer with full-codebase context
Visit
|
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph's AI code assistant — now enterprise-only
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.5 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | — | $59/user/month (Enterprise, annual contract; plans from ~$16,000/yr) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 200k+ developers |
| Founded | 2023 | 2013 |
| Maker | — | Sourcegraph |
| Verdict | Greptile's edge is full-codebase indexing: its reviewer reasons about your repo as a whole, so it catches cross-file and context-dependent bugs that diff-only reviewers miss. Recent additions (long-term memory, MCP integ... |
Cody used deep code-graph indexing from Sourcegraph's search platform to ground chat, autocomplete and edits in your actual repositories rather than just the open file — genuinely useful on large, tangled monorepos most... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.