Business 6 min read

Ant International's 89.5% AI Adoption Claim Has No Audit

The adoption figures are precise to a decimal place and every one is the company's own. The headline product is an account built for software to spend without a person approving it.

Eva Chin
Business & Chinese Culture Correspondent
Published 18 Sep 2026, 11:13 PM (SGT)
Share:
A shopkeeper in an apron holds out a card terminal while a customer taps a phone against it, shelves of pottery behind them A shopkeeper in an apron holds out a card terminal while a customer taps a phone against it, shelves of pottery behind them Photo by Mikhail Nilov on Pexels
Advertisement

18 SEP 2026 — Ant International announced about 100 products on 18 September and described itself as rebuilding its entire stack around artificial intelligence.

The announcement carries precise adoption figures — 89.5 per cent of Antom merchants deploying AI agents, 81.4 per cent of payment tasks AI-assisted. Every one of those numbers comes from the company, and none has been independently verified.

What was announced

The products span Ant International's four business lines: Alipay+ for cross-border payment connections, Antom for merchant payment services, WorldFirst for business accounts and transfers, and Bettr for lending technology.

Two models sit underneath. The Antom 3-in-1 Transformer is described as exceeding 10 billion parameters and processing 90 trillion units of data annually. FalconTST is put at more than 8.5 billion parameters with over 93 per cent accuracy in foreign exchange and cashflow forecasting, cutting corporate hedging and allocation costs by 30 to 60 per cent in what the company calls real-world cases.

The company also introduced Account for Agent, which it calls "the world's first truly agentic account for businesses" — a payment account designed for an AI agent to transact rather than a person.

The numbers are the company's

Notice the specificity. A figure of 89.5 per cent reads as measured rather than estimated, and so does 81.4 per cent. The chargeback reduction stated as up to 87 per cent has the same register.

A precise number is not an audited one. Trade coverage recorded that the figures came from the company, with no independent audit mentioned. That bounds what anyone can responsibly say about them: these are Ant International's claims about its own systems, and they remain claims until somebody outside the company checks them.

Two figures narrow considerably once you read the qualifiers. The 89.5 per cent counts clients of the main merchant payment service who took up the company's own suite over twelve months. It says nothing about how widely AI is used in payments beyond Ant International's own customer base. The 87 per cent chargeback reduction applies to "the leading LLM clients for our newly launched subscription service" — a selected group within a new tier, and a small fraction of the merchant base.

~100Products announced
10bn+Parameters, Antom Transformer
89.5%Merchant AI-agent adoption, company-stated
NoneFigures independently verified

The scale underneath

The business-scale figures are large and mostly checkable against the company's prior disclosures: 150 million merchants, 2 billion consumer accounts across 210 markets, 25 million transactions a day.

The model specifications matter less than two pieces of plumbing. WhaleRTP, a blockchain-based wholesale settlement platform connected to 23 financial institutions, is said to have carried 45 per cent of Ant International's cross-border volume in 2025. The Agentic Mobile Protocol went live in April 2026 with 10 Alipay+ wallet partners and 7 acquirers, and supports settlement increments as small as one millionth of a dollar.

That last detail matters. No human transacts at one millionth of a dollar; the increment exists so software can pay software in fragments, which is the shape an agent economy would take if it arrives.

What an agent account implies

Account for Agent has consequences beyond this announcement. A payment account operated by an autonomous agent raises questions the payments industry has not settled. Who authorises a transaction the account holder did not personally approve? How is a disputed agent purchase charged back? What may a merchant assume about consent?

Ant International describes the account as built on smart contracts with know-your-agent checks, monitoring and intervention. Those are controls on how an agent behaves, and they leave open who carries the loss when it misbehaves. The industry has been moving this way for a while — we covered Mastercard switching on agent payments in Singapore and Malaysia and Cloudflare's x402 agent payment work — but nobody has settled who pays when an agent buys the wrong thing.

Regulators in Singapore and elsewhere have not written rules for this, because the products have not existed. Building one ahead of the rules is a position, and a familiar one for this group.

Advertisement

Where this sits competitively

Peng Yang, the chief executive, framed the release as an AI-native rebuild rather than features added to existing systems. Every large payments operator is making a version of that claim at present, so the architecture tells a reader very little on its own. Scrutiny belongs on the adoption figures.

On the same evidence, Ant International's competitors could announce comparable numbers tomorrow and be subject to exactly the same doubt. The whole category reports itself this way.

What would change this

An independent audit would be more convincing than another product announcement. The adoption numbers are checkable in principle — a merchant survey, an auditor's report, a regulatory filing — and none has been offered.

Account for Agent will need a rulebook before it can scale. Whether that rulebook is written by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, by card networks, or by Ant International itself has different answers for merchants.

FalconTST's 93 per cent means little until a benchmark is attached to it. Accuracy against which task, measured how, compared with what baseline — none of that has been stated.

Advertisement
Eva Chin
Business & Chinese Culture Correspondent

Eva Chin covers business and commerce in Southeast Asia for RECATOOLS, alongside Chinese cultural practice and education.

View author profile → · Editorial policy

Corrections policy

Advertisement