HKD cheque words converter. Output formal Traditional Chinese capital wording for HK bank cheques (壹仟貳佰元整).
HK Dollar Cheque Words
How to use the HKD Cheque Words Tool
Enter the HKD amount
Type the HK Dollar amount with up to 2 decimal places (e.g. 1234.56). Use the example buttons to quickly load common test values.
Read the formal output
The tool emits Traditional Chinese capital wording (港幣壹仟貳佰叁拾肆元伍角陸分) plus a breakdown into yuan / jiao / fen.
Copy to clipboard
Hit the Copy button to grab the wording for paste into spreadsheets, PDF templates, or eCheque systems.
Verify your hand-written cheque
The primary use-case is cross-checking a hand-written cheque before delivery. HKMA still requires the wording to be hand-written — don't print and stick this output onto a paper cheque.
Writing a Hong Kong cheque amount in Chinese
Writing the amount in capital numerals (壹貳叁肆伍陸柒捌玖拾佰仟萬) is an old defence against altered figures: a few strokes turn 一 into 七, but 壹 cannot be tampered with. On a Hong Kong cheque Chinese and English are both accepted. The law settles only one thing: if the words and the figures disagree, the words govern (Bills of Exchange Ordinance, Cap. 19, s.9(2)).
Where the zeros go
A gap of zeros inside the number is written with one 零, however long the gap, and a number never ends in 零. So HK$1,004 is 壹仟零肆元整 and HK$10,001 is 壹萬零壹元整. When the 角 place is zero but the 分 place is not, the 零 is required: HK$325.04 is 叁佰貳拾伍元零肆分. These rules come from the People's Bank of China's 1997 rules on filling in payment instruments; Hong Kong has no equivalent rule of its own, but almost every Chinese-language cheque guide descends from that document.
The choices guides disagree about
We compared nine Hong Kong cheque guides across seven decisions, and not one decision had them all agreeing: three is written 叁, 叄 or 參; ten is 拾 or 壹拾; the dollar is 元 or 圓; and the amount ends 整 or 正. Banks accept all of them. This tool writes 叁, 壹拾 and 元整, the commonest Hong Kong choices; change them by hand if your own practice differs.
How many cheques Hong Kong still writes
From the monthly clearing statistics published by Hong Kong Interbank Clearing, the past twelve months brought 48.9 million cheques worth HK$5.76 trillion, about 134,000 cheques and HK$15.8 billion on an average working day. The number of cheques is down 65.8% since 1997, while the average cheque has risen to about HK$117,660.
The conversion runs in your browser; the amount is never sent anywhere.
壹 has twelve strokes and 七 has two — that is the anti-forgery design
When the words and the figures on a cheque disagree, the words govern — Bills of Exchange Ordinance (Cap. 19), s.9(2). That is what the written amount is for.
壹 (one) has 12 strokes and 七 (seven) has two. The capitals work by being crowded and unlike each other, so an added stroke shows.
A Hong Kong cheque may be written in Chinese or in English. No rule requires the Chinese capitals, and banks accept either.
Across nine Hong Kong cheque guides and seven writing choices, not one choice was unanimous: 叁/叄/參 for three, 拾 or 壹拾 for ten, 元 or 圓 for the dollar, 整 or 正 at the end.
The capital numerals are about seven centuries older than the Ming: the scholar Gu Yanwu cites documents from 587 and 664 CE. The story that the first Ming emperor invented them is not accurate.
Hong Kong cleared 48.9 million cheques worth HK$5.76 trillion in the past twelve months: about HK$117,660 a cheque, with the number of cheques down 65.8% since 1997.
When the 角 place is zero but the 分 place is not, the 零 is required: HK$325.04 is 叁佰貳拾伍元零肆分. It is the rule people most often get wrong.
With an e-Cheque the bank generates the words from the figure, and the Monetary Authority warns payees not to print one out to deposit it.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
No. A Hong Kong cheque may be written in Chinese or English; no ordinance or Monetary Authority rule requires the Chinese capitals.
-
The words, under Cap. 19 s.9(2). In practice a bank will usually return the cheque, so write a fresh one.
-
Either; they carry the same effect. This tool writes 整.
-
Both are used — Hong Kong's own ten-dollar coin is inscribed 拾圓. 壹拾 is harder to alter, so this tool writes 壹拾.
-
We found no Hong Kong bank or regulator rule refusing them. The mainland rule runs the other way: it expressly orders traditional forms to be accepted.
-
Use it to check your wording, and fill in the cheque the way your bank expects. An e-Cheque should never be printed out for deposit.
-
Not quite. Taiwan's own rule writes 參 rather than 叁 and stops at 億; the mainland uses the simplified capitals.
-
No. Everything is worked out in your browser.
Method & sources
How it computes
An amount is written out in the Chinese capital numerals used on cheques: 零壹貳叁肆伍陸柒捌玖 for the digits, with 拾佰仟 inside each four-digit block and 萬億 between blocks, then 元角分 for dollars, ten-cents and cents. Output is always Traditional Chinese regardless of the interface language, because that is the form a Hong Kong bank requires.
What this tool implements
- The capital forms (大寫) are used, not the everyday ones. 壹貳叁 rather than 一二三 is the point of the convention: the everyday characters can be altered with a few strokes and the capital forms cannot, which is why cheques have used them for centuries.
- Output stays Traditional Chinese even when the interface is in English or Simplified, because the cheque is a legal instrument and the required form does not follow the reader's language preference.
- Blocks are grouped in four digits with 萬 and 億 as the separators, which is the Chinese numbering system — not in threes like the Western thousand/million convention.
- 角 and 分 are written for the fractional part rather than a decimal, since a cheque has no decimal point.
Sources
- The Chinese capital-numeral (大寫) convention for financial instruments: 零壹貳叁肆伍陸柒捌玖 with 拾佰仟萬億, used because the forms resist alteration where 一二三 do not. ⚠️ The forms are much older than the rule about them — they appear on Tang-era stone inscriptions from Wu Zetian's reign and were already expected in Song official documents. What the Ming added, in the Hongwu reign (1368-1398) after the 郭桓案 embezzlement case in which a Board of Revenue vice-minister altered figures wholesale, was the LEGAL REQUIREMENT to keep accounts in them. Attributing their invention to Hongwu, as is commonly done, is wrong by several centuries.
What can make this go out of date
- Bank requirements change slowly but they do change, and cheque use itself is declining. What is written here is the conventional form; the bank's own current requirement is the authority if the two ever differ.
Pick up where you left off
Stored only in this browser — never sent to our servers.