Mem (Team)

Team tier of Mem's AI notes app — sharing-first, light collaboration

Productivity Paid
Researched · Published · Reviewed
RECATOOLS Score
6.6 / 10
Capability
7
Value for money
6
Ease of use
7
ASEAN readiness
6
API quality
4
Founded
2021
HQ
San Francisco, California
Users
50k+ team users
Launched
Jul 2026
Developer
Mem Labs

Overview

The team tier of Mem's rebuilt AI notes app (Mem 2.0, October 2025) — shared capture and AI search across a team's notes, with deliberately light collaboration: sharing groups and meeting-notes workflows rather than a structured company wiki.

Advertisement

Pricing

Pricing shown for reference only. These figures reflect RECATOOLS research as of 11 Jul 2026 and may be out of date or incomplete. This is not financial or purchasing advice — always confirm the current price on the provider’s official website before making any decision.

Free
$0
Basic notes and chat
  • 25 notes/mo
  • 25 chat messages/mo
  • 25 PDF pages in search/chat
Pro
$12/mo
Unlimited core AI note-taking
  • Unlimited notes & chat
  • Unlimited deep search
  • Unlimited collections & templates

Use cases

Building a persistent company knowledge base that survives employee turnover Finding relevant past decisions when working on similar problems to what the team faced 18 months ago Generating new proposals and documents grounded in existing company knowledge
Advertisement

ASEAN Perspective

Mem (Team) in Southeast Asia

ASEAN-region availability and pricing notes coming soon. Drop the editorial team a note via /contact/ if you can supply local context (Singapore/Malaysia/Indonesia/Thailand/Vietnam).

RECATOOLS Verdict

Mem 2.0 (October 2025) rebuilt the app from scratch and repositioned it as an "AI Thought Partner" — faster, offline-first, with voice capture and genuinely good AI retrieval. But the team story got smaller, not bigger: Mem sunset several 1.0 collaboration features, renamed Groups to "Sharing Groups" explicitly to lower expectations, and still lacks note comments. What Teams buys today is shared capture and AI search over collective notes — synchronous knowledge sharing like meeting notes, not an asynchronous company wiki. For small AI-forward teams that value retrieval over structure, that's a reasonable trade. Larger teams needing permissions, governance, and integrations should stay with Notion or Confluence. Pricing is contact-sales; support responsiveness draws recurring complaints.

Independent AI-assisted assessment by RECATOOLS.

What people say

Anyone shopping for a Notion or Confluence replacement should keep walking — Mem's own transition notes all but say so. When Mem 2.0 shipped on October 1, 2025, the company rebuilt the product from scratch as an "AI Thought Partner" and deliberately shrank the collaboration story: note comments from 1.0 haven't returned, and Groups was renamed "Sharing Groups" specifically, in Mem's words, to set expectations about what its collaborative capabilities are today.

That makes the old "self-organising company wiki" pitch — SmartWrite drafting proposals from institutional knowledge, AI answering "what did we decide last quarter?" across a shared brain — a description of Mem 1.0, which no longer exists. What a team gets in 2.0 is shared capture plus genuinely fast AI retrieval: meeting notes, voice memos, web clips, and email flowing into a common pool the AI can search and resurface. The rebuild fixed the chronic 1.0 complaints about sluggishness and sync inconsistencies, and added offline-first apps, voice capture, and a capture-anything Chrome extension.

The honest fit is a small, AI-forward team that wants zero-structure capture and trusts search over hierarchy. There are no real enterprise permissions, admin controls are light, integrations are few, and reviewers keep flagging slow support responses. Team pricing is contact-sales (one tracker lists a roughly $20-per-seat figure, but Mem doesn't publish it), which is a lot of friction for a product this young in its second life.

Score it as a niche pick: excellent retrieval, deliberately thin governance, and a vendor that has already restarted once.

Summary of public user & expert reviews, compiled by RECATOOLS.

Notable facts

  • Mem's automatic knowledge linking has been described as 'building a second brain for your entire company rather than just for individuals'.
  • The AI can identify that two seemingly unrelated projects are working on the same underlying problem by recognising semantic connections across documents.
  • Teams using Mem report 30% reduction in time spent searching for information and recreating knowledge that already exists in the organisation.

Frequently asked questions

How does Mem Teams differ from Notion?
Mem organises knowledge automatically without manual structure. Notion requires you to build and maintain your own database and page structure.
Can Mem Teams replace a wiki?
For unstructured knowledge capture, yes. For formally structured documentation, Notion or Confluence are stronger.
Is Mem Teams free?
No. $23/month per member. Individual Mem has a free tier.
How does Mem search work across team documents?
AI semantic search finds relevant documents by meaning, not just keywords.
Can Mem integrate with Slack or Gmail?
Yes. Capture information from Slack and Gmail directly into the team knowledge base.

About this listing

Researched on
Published on
Last reviewed

This entry was compiled from publicly available data including Mem (Team)'s official website, press releases, documentation, and reputable third-party publications. RECATOOLS is not affiliated with Mem (Team) unless explicitly stated.

Data accuracy

Third-party AI tools update their pricing, features, availability, and policies frequently. Information here may be outdated by the time you read this — we make reasonable efforts to keep listings current, but cannot guarantee absolute accuracy.

For the latest details, please refer to Mem (Team) directly →

Spotted something out of date? Suggest an update →

Advertisement