Logseq
Open-source outliner with local-first storage
Overview
Logseq is an open-source, local-first outliner inspired by Roam Research. Markdown-based files, end-to-end encryption for sync, plugin ecosystem with AI tools. Free; sponsor tier for hosted sync.
Pricing
Pricing shown for reference only. These figures reflect RECATOOLS research as of 20 May 2026 and may be out of date or incomplete. This is not financial or purchasing advice — always confirm the current price on the provider’s official website before making any decision.
Use cases
What you can produce with Logseq
- Capture daily notes in an automatic journal page and link ideas together with [[wikilinks]] and block references.
- Manage tasks by marking any bullet TODO/DOING/DONE and pulling everything due into one queries-driven dashboard.
- Keep an entire knowledge base as local Markdown files you control, readable and greppable outside the app forever.
- Sync notes across devices with end-to-end encryption via Logseq Sync, or point the graph at your own Git or file sync.
- Annotate PDFs and link highlights directly into your notes for literature review workflows.
- Study flashcards generated from your own notes using the built-in spaced-repetition feature.
- Extend the app with community plugins and themes, from Kanban boards to AI assistants.
ASEAN Perspective
Logseq in Southeast Asia
ASEAN-region availability and pricing notes coming soon. Drop the editorial team a note via /contact/ if you can supply local context (Singapore/Malaysia/Indonesia/Thailand/Vietnam).
Logseq is a free, open-source, local-first outliner for personal knowledge management, built around bullet-based blocks, bidirectional links, and a daily-journal workflow. Its plain-text Markdown storage and privacy-first stance appeal strongly to people wary of cloud lock-in, and the graph view plus query system reward heavy note-takers.
It suits researchers, students, and PKM enthusiasts who value data ownership and an outliner workflow. Caveats: the learning curve is steeper than linear note apps, official sync has been less polished than rivals, and the project has gone through a significant database-version rewrite that brought some instability and migration friction. AI features are minimal — this is a notes tool, not an AI product.
What people say
Logseq is still alive, free and open source, but it is a project in a long, uncomfortable transition. The team has been rewriting the app from Markdown-file storage to a database backend since late 2022, and the timeline has slipped repeatedly: as of late 2025 the DB version was in beta and the new mobile app and real-time sync were in alpha, while the stable release most people use remains the older file-based build. The slow, quiet cadence has become the defining community complaint, with visible threads of users migrating to Obsidian or AFFiNE.
What users praise has not changed. Logseq's outliner-plus-backlinks model is excellent for daily journaling, networked notes and task capture; everything is local-first plain text you own; sync can be end-to-end encrypted; and the plugin ecosystem covers everything from spaced repetition to AI assistants. For privacy-conscious note-takers it remains one of the most credible free options, and nobody accuses it of lock-in — your notes are Markdown files on disk.
The pain points are concrete. Performance degrades badly on large file-based graphs — users report graphs of around 2,000 pages taking minutes to open, with basic operations like expanding bullets lagging for many seconds — which is precisely what the DB rewrite is meant to fix. Meanwhile bug fixes and features for the current version have largely stalled during the rewrite, mobile apps lag desktop, and would-be adopters face genuine uncertainty about whether to start in the file version or wait for the DB era.
Logseq fits patient, technical, privacy-first users who love outliners and plain-text ownership and keep graphs modest in size. People who need polished mobile apps, fast iteration or dependable performance on very large vaults should weigh Obsidian or other actively-shipping alternatives until the DB version fully lands.
Summary of public user & expert reviews, compiled by RECATOOLS.
About this listing
This entry was compiled from publicly available data including Logseq's official website, press releases, documentation, and reputable third-party publications. RECATOOLS is not affiliated with Logseq unless explicitly stated.
Third-party AI tools update their pricing, features, availability, and policies frequently. Information here may be outdated by the time you read this — we make reasonable efforts to keep listings current, but cannot guarantee absolute accuracy.
For the latest details, please refer to Logseq directly →
Spotted something out of date? Suggest an update →
Logseq in the news
More in Productivity