Sana vs Glean vs Dust vs Atlassian Rovo

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Sana AI work assistant unifying knowledge across SaaS tools Visit Glean Enterprise search and AI assistant for work Visit Dust Build custom AI assistants for your team Visit Atlassian Rovo Cross-tool AI search and agents for Atlassian Cloud teams Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.4 / 10 7.8 / 10 7.4 / 10 6.8 / 10
Capability 8 9 8 7
Value for money 6 6 7 6
Ease of use 7 6 6 7
ASEAN readiness 6 6 6 6
API quality 6 7 7 7
Pricing Enterprise Enterprise Freemium Enterprise
Free tier
Paid from Enterprise custom; reported ~$50-75/user/month, ~100-seat minimum
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users $300M ARR as of May 2026 (customer count not officially disclosed
Founded 2016 2019 2022 2024
Maker
Verdict

Sana is a polished enterprise AI platform for building no-code agents grounded in company knowledge, with strong multimodal retrieval across documents, recordings and CRM data, 100+ connectors and a serious security post...

Glean is a leading enterprise work-AI platform: it indexes a company's SaaS apps (email, docs, tickets, chat, code) into a permissions-aware search and assistant, with an agent-building layer on top. Its strengths are co...

Dust is one of the stronger platforms for building custom AI agents over a company's own knowledge and tools — connect Notion, Slack, GitHub, Google Drive, Salesforce and more, then assemble model-agnostic agents (across...

Rovo's real trick is turning Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket and connected apps into one searchable graph, so questions that used to mean five separate searches return in one chat exchange. G2 reviewers report saving around...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.