OpenCode vs OpenAI Codex CLI vs Crush vs Kilo Code

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

	OpenCode Free, open-source terminal coding agent with 75+ model providers Visit	OpenAI Codex CLI OpenAI's open-source terminal coding agent, now on GPT-5.3-Codex. Visit	Crush Charm's open-source, cross-platform terminal AI coding agent Visit	Kilo Code Open-source coding agent with 500+ models and zero-markup BYOK Visit
RECATOOLS Score	7.9 / 10	8.2 / 10	7.5 / 10	7.4 / 10
Capability	7.5	8.5	7	7
Value for money	8.5	7.5	8.5	8
Ease of use	7.5	7.5	7.5	7
ASEAN readiness	6.5	6.5	6.5	6
API quality	7.5	8	0	6
Pricing	Open Source	Freemium	Open Source	Open Source
Free tier	—	—	—	—
Paid from	—	—	—	—
Has API	✓	✓	✗	✓
Open source	✓	✓	✓	✓
Free to use	✓	✓	✓	✓
Users	—	—	—	—
Founded	—	—	—	—
Maker	—	—	—	—
Verdict	OpenCode has become the default open-source answer to Claude Code — MIT-licensed, provider-agnostic, and reportedly past 160,000 GitHub stars with millions of monthly users. Plan mode (reason before you let it write) and...	Codex CLI has scaled into a real Claude Code rival: OpenAI's repo sits at roughly 97,000 GitHub stars and the tool now ships baked into every ChatGPT tier, including Free. Reddit sentiment leans toward Codex for token ef...	Crush carries Charm's design pedigree (Bubble Tea, Gum, Glow) into agentic coding, and it shows — reviewers consistently call it the best-looking TUI in the category. LSP integration means it reasons about actual functio...	Kilo Code's lineage — forked from Roo Code, which forked Cline, in March 2025 — shows in how fast it's matured: Reddit's r/kilocode describes it as "Cursor but open and free," and by mid-2026 it had crossed 3 million dow...
	Full review →	Full review →	Full review →	Full review →

← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.