Granola vs Bloks
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Granola
The AI notepad for people in back-to-back meetings
Visit
|
Bloks
Bot-free meeting notes that keep an advisor's client records current
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.8 / 10 | 6.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free tier | Basic: free AI meeting notes, chat and shared folders, with the last 30 days of meeting history visible | No free plan; 14-day free trial with every feature included |
| Paid from | $14/user/month (Business); Enterprise $35/user/month | From US$69/mo per advisor, billed annually |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2024 | 2021 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Granola remains the most polished bot-free notetaker: nothing joins the call, and your shorthand is expanded with transcript context into notes people actually reread. Since July 2026 it covers Android as well as macOS,... |
Bloks is no longer a general notetaker but a narrow tool for financial and insurance advisors that wants to replace CRM data entry: bot-free notes, self-updating client profiles, pre-meeting briefs and KYP paperwork draf... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.