Fellow vs Otter.ai
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Fellow
Meeting agendas plus a security-first AI notetaker, now at fellow.ai
Visit
|
Otter.ai
Live meeting transcripts, summaries and AI meeting agents
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.8 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | Free for up to 5 seats: 5 AI notes and 5 AI recordings per user (lifetime), with Meet, Zoom, Teams and Slack integrations | 300 transcription minutes a month, 30 minutes per conversation, 3 lifetime file imports, 20 AI Chat queries a month |
| Paid from | $7/user/month (Team, billed annually); $11 billed monthly | $8.33/user/month billed annually, or $16.99 month to month (Pro) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | 35m+ users |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| Maker | — | Sam Liang, Yun Fu |
| Verdict | Fellow's strengths are structure and governance. Shared agendas and tracked action items make recurring meetings more disciplined, and bot or botless capture, redaction, retention policies, HIPAA BAAs and a stated no-tra... |
Otter remains one of the most complete meeting notetakers: live transcripts with speaker labels, summaries, action items, an AI chat across your meeting history and, on higher plans, CRM sync and agents. The free plan is... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.