Clay vs Apollo.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Clay AI data enrichment and GTM workflows for B2B prospecting Visit Apollo.io B2B contact data, outreach and AI sales agents in one credit-based pla... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.3 / 10 7.3 / 10
Capability 8 7
Value for money 6 8
Ease of use 5 7
ASEAN readiness 6 6
API quality 7 7
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Free tier Free: 500 Actions and 100 Data Credits a month, unlimited seats, up to 200 rows per table Free plan: 900 credits per seat a year (75 a month), 2 sequences, 5 AI Assistant chats, 150 minutes of call recording, Gmail only
Paid from $185/month (Launch, billed monthly), or $167/month billed annually $49/seat/month billed annually (Basic), or $65/seat/month billed monthly
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✗ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — —
Founded 2017 2015
Maker — —
Verdict

Clay is a powerful GTM data-enrichment and automation workspace that pulls from 150+ data providers in one place, layers AI research through Claygent, and lets teams build spreadsheet-style enrichment and outreach workfl...

Apollo.io remains the most complete low-cost outbound stack: contact data, sequencing, dialing, enrichment and now AI agents under one per-seat price, with a free plan that is genuinely usable for testing. The credit sys...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.