AIVA vs Suno

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

AIVA AI composer for instrumental soundtracks, with copyright ownership on... Visit Suno Full songs with vocals from a text prompt, now on label-licensed v6 mo... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.6 / 10 8.2 / 10
Capability 6 8.5
Value for money 7 7.5
Ease of use 8 9
ASEAN readiness 6 6.5
API quality 2 5.5
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Free tier Free forever: 3 downloads/mo, tracks up to 3 min, MP3 and MIDI; non-commercial only, AIVA keeps copyright, credit to AIVA required 50 credits a day on v6-mini, standard features, no commercial rights and no monthly downloads
Paid from Standard €15/mo (€11 billed yearly); Pro €49/mo (€33 billed yearly); all + VAT Pro $10/month or $96/year, Premier $30/month or $288/year
Has API ✗ ✓
Open source ✗ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — 100M+ (2M paid subscribers)
Founded 2016 2023
Maker Independent (AIVA Technologies SARL) —
Verdict

AIVA is an approachable way to get original instrumental music quickly, and its MIDI export and editor make it useful to musicians as well as non-musicians. Read the licence carefully: only Pro transfers copyright and al...

Suno is still the easiest way to get a complete, produced song from a sentence, and v6 adds the editing control it lacked: rewrite a chorus or one line in plain language, pull stems, combine songs. The licensing deals wi...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.