Textio vs Grammarly
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Textio
AI 'augmented writing' that flags biased language in HR content
Visit
|
Grammarly
AI writing assistant that checks grammar, style, tone, and clarity acr...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| Capability | — | |
| Value for money | — | |
| Ease of use | — | |
| ASEAN readiness | — | |
| API quality | — | |
| Pricing | Enterprise | Freemium |
| Free tier | No self-serve tier | Basic grammar and spell checking, limited suggestions |
| Paid from | Enterprise seat licensing, reported from ~$15,000/year | ~US$12/month (Premium, billed annually) |
| Has API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | 1,300+ enterprise customers | over 40 million daily active users (2025) |
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| Maker | Jensen Harris, Kieran Snyder | Alex Shevchenko, Max Lytvyn, Dmytro Lider |
| Verdict | Textio invented this niche and still owns the mindshare: real-time guidance that rewrites job descriptions and, more distinctively, performance-review feedback to strip bias and vague filler. The performance-management s... |
Grammarly is still the most established writing assistant: reliable mechanics checking, tone and clarity suggestions, and generative rewriting embedded nearly everywhere you type. The core product survived the October 20... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.