CodeFuse 蚂蚁CodeFuse vs Qoder CN (formerly Tongyi Lingma 通义灵码)

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

CodeFuse 蚂蚁CodeFuse Ant Group's open code models, training frameworks and AI coding tools Visit Qoder CN (formerly Tongyi Lingma 通义灵码) Alibaba's China coding agent, renamed from Tongyi Lingma in May 2026 Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.4 / 10 6.4 / 10
Capability 7 7
Value for money 8 8
Ease of use 4 7
ASEAN readiness 5 4
API quality 5 4
Pricing Open Source Freemium
Free tier Open-source code (Apache-2.0) and model weights (Apache-2.0 or the CodeFuse Community License) are free to self-host 体验版: a limited trial allowance plus a two-week Pro trial with 300 credits
Paid from — ¥59/month (专业版, 2,000 credits; 10% off yearly); team seats from ¥99/seat/month
Has API ✓ ✗
Open source ✓ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — Over 13 million plugin downloads total by May 2025 (was 9 million by January 2025)
Founded 2023 2023
Maker Ant Group Alibaba Cloud
Verdict

CodeFuse is valuable as a research resource: open code models, the MFTCoder multi-task fine-tuning framework, evaluation sets and newer embedding models from one of China's largest engineering organisations.It is not a m...

Qoder CN is what Tongyi Lingma became on 20 May 2026: a credit-metered coding agent with Quest mode, Repo Wiki, sub-agents and a choice of Qwen, GLM and DeepSeek models, sold from ¥59 a month for individuals and ¥99 a se...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.