Atlassian Rovo vs Dust vs Glean vs Sana

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Atlassian Rovo Cross-tool AI search and agents for Atlassian Cloud teams Visit Dust Build custom AI assistants for your team Visit Glean Enterprise search and AI assistant for work Visit Sana AI work assistant unifying knowledge across SaaS tools Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.8 / 10 7.4 / 10 7.8 / 10 7.4 / 10
Capability 7 8 9 8
Value for money 6 7 6 6
Ease of use 7 6 6 7
ASEAN readiness 6 6 6 6
API quality 7 7 7 6
Pricing Enterprise Freemium Enterprise Enterprise
Free tier
Paid from Enterprise custom; reported ~$50-75/user/month, ~100-seat minimum
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users $300M ARR as of May 2026 (customer count not officially disclosed
Founded 2024 2022 2019 2016
Maker
Verdict

Rovo's real trick is turning Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket and connected apps into one searchable graph, so questions that used to mean five separate searches return in one chat exchange. G2 reviewers report saving around...

Dust is one of the stronger platforms for building custom AI agents over a company's own knowledge and tools — connect Notion, Slack, GitHub, Google Drive, Salesforce and more, then assemble model-agnostic agents (across...

Glean is a leading enterprise work-AI platform: it indexes a company's SaaS apps (email, docs, tickets, chat, code) into a permissions-aware search and assistant, with an agent-building layer on top. Its strengths are co...

Sana is a polished enterprise AI platform for building no-code agents grounded in company knowledge, with strong multimodal retrieval across documents, recordings and CRM data, 100+ connectors and a serious security post...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.