OVHcloud Warns of Price Rises up to 87% on Memory Costs

Macro view of a memory module — gold edge contacts along a green circuit board with black DRAM packages above them — the component whose price has risen sixfold in a year. Photo by TobiasD on Pixabay

CLOUD & INFRA · 12 Aug 2026 —

ROUBAIX, 11 AUG 2026 — OVHcloud is raising server rental prices by up to 87 per cent, and the reason is memory. Chief executive Octave Klaba set out the arithmetic in public: the price OVH pays for RAM has risen sixfold in the year to June, will be nine times by September, and twelve times next year.

This is the AI datacentre buildout arriving on somebody else's invoice. The hyperscalers are buying memory at a scale that has repriced it for everyone, and a French hosting company with a lot of small customers is where that shows up first.

The numbers

Klaba published them on X rather than in a press release. The register is that of a supplier explaining a cost shock to its customers rather than a company announcing a strategy.

RAM: 6× → 9× → 12×What OVH pays, in the year to June 2026, by September, and next year.

NVMe 7× · disks 3.5×CPUs, motherboards and network cards up a comparatively mild 15–20%.

+87% worst case2026-edition gaming servers. Other recent servers rise 40–59%.

From SeptemberNew servers. Decoupled storage and IP billing change on 1 October.

Existing customers renewing get increases three to six times smaller than new orders — a deliberate choice to protect the installed base and load the cost onto new business.

Klaba's own line is unusually plain: "It's very frustrating to increase prices for a player like OVHcloud, because we make a lot of effort to be as relevant as possible on prices."

Why memory and not chips

The instinctive assumption is that an AI shortage means GPUs. The constraint here sits lower down the bill of materials, in the commodity DRAM and NVMe underneath everything.

Memory is a classic cyclical commodity made by a very small number of manufacturers, on fabs that take years to build and are not built speculatively. When a new source of demand arrives that is both enormous and price-insensitive, it does not merely take the spare supply. It sets a new clearing price for everybody, because the marginal buyer is now somebody for whom memory is a rounding error against the value of the model being served.

A hosting company renting a €40-a-month server has no such headroom. It has to pass the cost on or stop offering the product.

Who actually pays

The incidence of this price rise is upside down.

The price rise affects organisations inversely to their role in causing it. The hyperscalers driving demand are least affected. The ones paying most, proportionally, are the small businesses, developers, and hobbyists on modest VPSs who chose OVH for its low prices and have the least room to absorb a 40 to 87 per cent increase.

It is a transfer, and not one anybody decided on. Nobody set out to make small hosting more expensive to make large models cheaper.

How long

The most useful forward-looking number in the announcement is OVH’s own forecast: "We believe that this situation will last until 2028, with a return to normal hoped for in 2029."

"Believe" for the shortage, "hoped" for the recovery. That is a company telling you it has visibility into the constrained period and none into the other side of it.

Three years is long enough that treating this as a blip is a planning error. If your costs are memory-shaped, they are now structurally higher until roughly the end of the decade.

What to do about it

Renew before September if you are on an OVH contract and the smaller renewal increase applies to you. That is the one time-limited action here.

Then audit what you are actually paying for. Memory is the component repricing hardest, so the cheapest optimisation available has moved from CPU efficiency to RAM footprint. An application that idles on 8 GB because nobody ever measured it is carrying a cost that has quietly risen sixfold at the supplier and is now arriving at the invoice.

And treat any multi-year hosting quote that assumes flat pricing with suspicion, in either direction. Providers who have not repriced yet are either absorbing the cost or have not reached their renewal cycle.

What to watch

Keep an eye on whether the hyperscalers raise their own prices. So far the cost has surfaced where margins are thinnest, at the small end of the market. The shortage will have stopped being absorbable if it starts showing up in the large clouds' list prices.

Watch if other providers follow with comparable arithmetic. OVH published specific multiples; competitors who raise prices without showing their work should be treated sceptically.

And whether memory fab investment responds. Twelve times is the kind of price signal that builds factories — but a fab announced now produces in 2029, which is precisely the year OVH hopes things normalise.

Kenji Tanaka’s Verdict Developer Tools & Cloud

This is the AI datacentre buildout arriving on somebody else's invoice, and the incidence is upside down. The organisations bidding memory up are the least affected by its price; the people paying proportionally most are running a forty-euro VPS. Nobody decided that. It is what a shared commodity supply does when one buyer's willingness to pay detaches from everybody else's. Two things I would act on. First, the timing: renewals carry increases three to six times smaller than new orders, and the rises start in September, so if you are on OVH and can renew early, that is the whole of the arbitrage. Second, the optimisation target has moved. For a decade the cheap win was CPU efficiency; with RAM at six times and heading for twelve, the cheap win is now footprint. An app idling on 8GB because nobody measured it is carrying a cost that has multiplied at the supplier. And read Klaba's verbs on the outlook — “believe” the shortage lasts to 2028, “hoped” for normal in 2029. That is a company with visibility into the constrained period and none into the recovery. Three years is long enough that treating this as a blip is a planning error.

Sources & cross-checks

Primary: The Register, 11 August 2026 — for OVH chief executive Octave Klaba announcing the increases via posts on X; rises of 87 per cent on 2026-edition gaming servers and 40–59 per cent on other recent servers; existing customers renewing seeing increases three to six times lower than new orders; the component multiples of RAM at six times in the year to June 2026, nine times by September and twelve times next year, NVMe drives at seven times, hard disks at 3.5 times and CPUs, motherboards and network cards up 15–20 per cent; increases starting in September with decoupled storage (€0.000146/GB/hour) and IP billing (€0.0027/hour) on Gen3 instances from 1 October; the attribution to the “hyperscale buying frenzy sparked by the AI boom”; the expectation that “this situation will last until 2028, with a return to normal hoped for in 2029”; and Klaba's remark that “it's very frustrating to increase prices for a player like OVHcloud, because we make a lot of effort to be as relevant as possible on prices”.
Corroborated: Techzine — for the same warning of price rises of up to 87 per cent driven by the memory shortage, and for the tiered figures of roughly +28 per cent on Gen 2024 equipment and +51 per cent on Gen 2026.
What could not be established: ⚠ We could not establish which OVH products outside servers are affected, whether the increases apply outside Europe or differ by region, what proportion of OVH's bill of materials memory represents, whether competitors have announced comparable rises, or any independent confirmation of the component multiples, which are OVH's own figures for what it pays. We did not read Klaba's original posts directly. We sought comment from OVHcloud.
Method and limits: Compiled 11 August 2026. The explanation of why memory rather than GPUs is the binding constraint, the argument about a price-insensitive marginal buyer resetting the clearing price, the analysis of who bears the cost proportionally, the reading of “believe” versus “hoped” in the outlook, and the advice on renewal timing and memory footprint are RECATOOLS analysis rather than claims by OVHcloud. Nothing here is investment advice.

Tags: #Infrastructure #Semiconductors #Cloud

RECATOOLS Editorial

General Editorial Desk

The RECATOOLS Editorial desk covers platform updates, tool explainers, digital trends, and practical guides for everyday users and professionals.

View author profile → · Editorial policy

About this byline RECATOOLS Editorial is a general editorial desk byline. Articles are produced and reviewed under RECATOOLS editorial supervision. The articles listed here keep this byline. New coverage is published under the persona whose beat it falls in rather than under a general desk, so this byline is no longer used as a default.

Corrections policy