MANILA, 4 AUG 2026 — On 23 February the governor of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas said the country's digital payments target would probably slip. "To be honest, it's been slow," Eli M. Remolona Jr. said. "We're on track but maybe it will take a couple more years than we thought to get where we want to go." Asked whether the goal would extend past 2028, he answered: "Yeah, I think so."
On 29 July a deputy governor of the same institution said the opposite. "I'm more confident now that we will hit the 2028 Philippine Development Plan target of 70 percent," said Mamerto E. Tangonan, speaking at the launch of three new payment services.
Between those two statements, the underlying measurement did not change; both officials were working from the same published figure.
What the number actually is
The BSP's most recent e-payments measurement covers 2024, and puts digital payments at 57.4 per cent of monthly retail transactions by volume, up from 52.8 per cent in 2023. That was the latest published reading in February and it was still the latest published reading in July.
The target is also more forgiving than the shorthand suggests. The Philippine Development Plan sets a range for 2028 — 60 to 70 per cent of retail payment volume — against a 2021 baseline of 30.3 per cent, with interim bands of 54 to 58 per cent for 2025, 56 to 62 for 2026 and 58 to 66 for 2027.
The 57.4 per cent figure for 2024 already sits inside the target bands for both 2025 and 2026. The country is not off the path. The disagreement is about which end of the 2028 range it reaches, and both officials were talking about the top of it.
| Volume share | PDP band | |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 baseline | 30.3% | — |
| 2023 | 52.8% | — |
| 2024 (latest published) | 57.4% | — |
| 2025 target | — | 54–58% |
| 2026 target | — | 56–62% |
| 2027 target | — | 58–66% |
| 2028 target | — | 60–70% |
Shares are the BSP's own e-payments measurement; the bands are the Philippine Development Plan's. Reaching 70% from 57.4% needs about 3.2 points a year to 2028 — RECATOOLS arithmetic. The most recent observed year-on-year move was 4.6 points, so the required pace is below the last one achieved, which is the case for optimism and does not account for adoption curves flattening as penetration rises.
The two explanations do not contradict each other
This is not quite a reversal. The two statements came from different officials with different remits, each citing a different mechanism.
Remolona's caution in February was about risk, not adoption. He named cyber risk as the drag — digitalisation brings risks with it, and banks have to defend themselves against them even as the central bank pushes them forward. That is a governor talking about the constraint on how fast he is willing to go.
Tangonan's confidence in July was about plumbing. He credited fee reductions and the full commercial launch of fund-transfer facilities, and said volumes during the pilot phase had already been strong before commercial operation began. That is a payments deputy talking about throughput.
A system can be adopted quickly and still be a security concern, meaning the people responsible for each will describe the same year differently. The pairing shows how little a forecast at this range is worth on its own: five months apart, one institution, one dataset, two directions.
What actually launched
The services announced on 29 July with the Philippine Payments Management Inc. are the kind of ordinary payments infrastructure that moves numbers more than announcements do.
Direct Debit PH lets bank and e-wallet holders authorise a biller to collect automatically on scheduled due dates — the recurring-payment rail that most retail digital economies run on. InstaPay Cash-In lets a person request funds from someone else, who approves and transfers from their own bank or wallet. InstaPay for Business raises the ceiling on a single transfer by a registered business from 50,000 pesos to 500,000, a tenfold increase.
That last change is the one with the clearest mechanism behind it. A 50,000-peso ceiling pushes any business payment above it out of the instant rail and into cheques, transfers or cash — and those transactions are large, so they weigh heavily on the value share even when the volume share looks healthy. Raising the ceiling moves a category of payment that was previously excluded by design rather than by preference.
"Interoperability and lower transfer costs serve to increase broader participation in digital financial networks," Remolona said at the launch. Tangonan placed the initiative within the National Retail Payment System Framework.
There is a second target, and it is higher
The 60 to 70 per cent band is the government's. The industry has set itself a different one, and anyone reading the two as the same number will misread both.
Fintech Alliance.PH is pushing what it calls an 80×80 vision for 2028: 80 per cent of Filipino adults holding active digital transactional accounts, and 80 per cent of retail transactions made digitally. It sits inside a 2028 Digital Finance Industry Roadmap built on open finance, interoperable credit data, cybersecurity, digital trust and responsible innovation, and it asks the BSP and government partners for the policy and infrastructure reforms to support it.
The state's ambition is the industry's floor: the government's 70 per cent ceiling is ten points below where the trade body wants to be. That gap is not a contradiction — a regulator planning capacity and a sector planning growth should not have identical numbers — but it does mean the phrase "the 2028 target" carries two meanings in Philippine payments coverage, and they are not interchangeable.
The risk half of the argument has a number too
Remolona's February caution named cyber risk without quantifying it, and the quantification exists. Sumsub, an identity-verification firm, recorded a 291 per cent rise in synthetic identity document fraud in the Philippines in the first half of 2025 against the same period a year earlier — fraud built on identities assembled from real and fabricated fragments, which is precisely the failure mode that scales when account opening moves online and gets faster.
That figure does not settle the disagreement or vindicate February's caution over July's confidence. Fraud growing quickly from a small base is compatible with adoption growing quickly too, and a payments system can absorb a rising fraud rate if the underlying volume rises faster. But it does explain why a governor and a payments deputy can look at the same year and describe different problems. One is watching the denominator. The other is watching what is being subtracted from it.
The part to watch
The optimism published on 29 July is credited to facilities launched on 29 July. Whatever their eventual effect, they had produced no post-launch adoption data at the moment the forecast was revised, and the pilot volumes cited are not the same thing as commercial ones.
The surviving reading is narrow. The Philippines is inside its own interim bands and has been closing the gap at a pace that, if merely sustained, reaches the top of the 2028 range. It has just removed a structural ceiling on business transfers and added a recurring-payment rail, both of which are the kind of change that shows up in measurement rather than in speeches. The next honest test is the 2025 e-payments report. It will be the first reading published after these changes, and the first chance to check either February's caution or July's confidence against hard data.
Until then, the country has two forecasts from one central bank and one number underneath them both. We reported in April that the Philippines is the fastest-growing digital economy in ASEAN; nothing here disturbs that, and nothing here confirms which end of the band it lands on.
View author profile → · Editorial policy
