Thunders
Plain-language AI agents that write and self-heal your test suite
Overview
Thunders is a Paris/Tunis-built AI test-automation platform where agents create, run, and maintain web, mobile, API, and desktop test suites from plain-language prompts, integrating with GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, and Jira.
Pricing
Pricing shown for reference only. These figures reflect RECATOOLS research as of 12 Jul 2026 and may be out of date or incomplete. This is not financial or purchasing advice — always confirm the current price on the provider’s official website before making any decision.
- Up to 3 users
- 2 parallel runs
- AI test generation
- 30-day retention
- Up to 5 users
- 5 parallel runs
- Full persona catalog
- 90-day retention
- Custom credit volume
- SSO
- Dedicated success manager
- Custom/3rd-party personas
What you can produce with Thunders
- Plain-language test generation across web, mobile, API, and desktop
- AI-generated test personas for edge-case coverage
- Parallel test execution
- CI/CD integrations (GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps)
- Bidirectional Jira/Azure DevOps/GitHub Issues sync
- CLI and API access
- Free trial, cancel anytime
ASEAN Perspective
Thunders in Southeast Asia
ASEAN-region availability and pricing notes coming soon. Drop the editorial team a note via /contact/ if you can supply local context (Singapore/Malaysia/Indonesia/Thailand/Vietnam).
Thunders' plain-language pitch — describe a test, skip the selector maintenance — isn't new; Testim, Mabl, and half a dozen others chase the same problem. What differentiates it is scope (web, mobile, API, and desktop in one product) and real funding behind it: a $9M seed round and a team that's grown past 15 people across Paris and Tunis. CI/CD hooks into GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, and Azure DevOps look genuinely built out rather than bolted on.
Its efficiency numbers — 90% faster test creation, 88% less maintenance — are vendor-stated and worth checking against your own suite rather than taken at face value. Pricing starts around $480/month even on the Starter tier, which prices out solo developers despite the plan's own "solo testers" framing. Worth a pilot for a QA team juggling flaky scripts across multiple app types; budget-conscious teams should compare against cheaper single-surface tools first.
What people say
Thunders is young — founded in 2025 by a Paris-and-Tunis team — and public third-party reviews with real review counts haven't caught up with the vendor's own marketing yet. Most of what's findable is the company's own site, its help center, and roundup articles that list it alongside competitors like Testim, Mabl, and Katalon without independent scoring.
What the company documents clearly: a $9M seed round, a team that's grown past 15 people, and specific before/after numbers — cutting a roughly 45-minute spec-to-selector test-writing cycle down to a single plain-language prompt, and halving regression run time through parallel execution. AI-generated "personas" are meant to simulate realistic user behavior to catch edge cases scripted tests miss, which is a genuine differentiator over pure record-and-playback tools.
Pricing is tiered by credits rather than seats alone: Starter runs about $479/month for 300 credits (roughly 30,000 test steps) and up to 3 users with 2 parallel runs; Pro runs about $1,199/month for 1,000 credits and 5 users with 5 parallel runs, and is flagged as the most popular plan; Enterprise is custom, adding SSO, custom personas, and a dedicated success manager. Overage is billed per credit past the plan cap, with users notified before extra charges apply, and there's no lock-in on cancellation.
Integration coverage looks solid on paper — CLI and API access, bidirectional Jira/Azure DevOps/GitHub Issues sync, and Slack/Teams alerting on top of GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket connections — but there isn't yet independent, third-party verification of how reliable the AI-generated tests are at scale, or how much manual cleanup they actually need versus the marketing claim of near-zero maintenance. Teams evaluating it should run the free trial against a real regression suite rather than a demo scenario before committing to a monthly credit tier that scales in price quickly between Starter and Pro.
Summary of public user & expert reviews, compiled by RECATOOLS.
About this listing
This entry was compiled from publicly available data including Thunders's official website, press releases, documentation, and reputable third-party publications. RECATOOLS is not affiliated with Thunders unless explicitly stated.
Third-party AI tools update their pricing, features, availability, and policies frequently. Information here may be outdated by the time you read this — we make reasonable efforts to keep listings current, but cannot guarantee absolute accuracy.
For the latest details, please refer to Thunders directly →
Spotted something out of date? Suggest an update →
More in Code & Dev Tools
