Uizard vs Magic Patterns
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Uizard
AI mockups and prototypes from prompts, screenshots and sketches
Visit
|
Magic Patterns
AI prototypes for product teams, built from your own design system
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.3 / 10 | 7.2 / 10 |
| Capability | — | |
| Value for money | — | |
| Ease of use | — | |
| ASEAN readiness | — | |
| API quality | — | |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | Free: 3 AI generations a month on Autodesigner 1.5, 2 projects of up to 5 screens, 10 templates, unlimited viewers | Free plan with a monthly credit allowance (amount not published); watermark on previews; no on-demand usage, GitHub sync or MCP |
| Paid from | $12/month (Pro, billed annually; no monthly price shown) | Starter $20/seat/mo ($17 annual); Business $100/seat/mo ($85 annual); Enterprise custom |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | 2,500+ product teams |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| Maker | Miro | Independent (North Park Labs, Inc.) |
| Verdict | Uizard remains a fast way for non-designers to get from an idea to clickable screens: Autodesigner builds multi-screen projects from a prompt, and the scanners turn screenshots and sketches into editable mockups. The fre... |
Magic Patterns is aimed squarely at product teams rather than solo app builders: its strength is generating prototypes that use your own components and styles, imported from Figma, Storybook, npm or a codebase, and then... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.