Turnitin AI Writing Detection vs Pangram Labs
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Turnitin AI Writing Detection
The default campus AI detector, licensed through Turnitin Originality
Visit
|
Pangram Labs
AI-text detector with the lowest false-positive rate in a Chicago stud...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.8 / 10 | 8.1 / 10 |
| Capability | — | |
| Value for money | — | |
| Ease of use | — | |
| ASEAN readiness | — | |
| API quality | — | |
| Pricing | Enterprise | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | Free plan after sign-up: 20 AI text checks a day, including AI-assistance detection; the homepage also offers 3 free AI image scans a day |
| Paid from | Institutional quote only (requires a Turnitin Originality licence) | $20/month (Individual), or $180 billed annually |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | — | Used by businesses and institutions; a small team |
| Founded | 1998 | 2023 |
| Maker | Advance (Advance Publications); acquisition closed April 2019 | Max Spero (CEO) and Bradley Emi (CTO) |
| Verdict | Turnitin's detector is the campus default and has kept pace with new models and humanizer tools. Turnitin says false positives stay under 1 per cent on documents with over 20 per cent AI writing, but buys that by under-r... |
Pangram has the strongest outside evidence of any commercial AI detector we list: a University of Chicago working paper found its false positive rate essentially zero on its test corpus, lower than GPTZero and Originalit... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.