Trigger.dev vs Inngest vs n8n vs Modal

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Trigger.dev Code-first background jobs and AI workflows, no timeouts Visit Inngest Durable execution for backend and AI workflows, no queues to run. Visit n8n Open-source workflow automation with AI nodes Visit Modal Serverless GPU compute for AI workloads Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.9 / 10 7.8 / 10 8.4 / 10 7.8 / 10
Capability 7.5 7.5 9 8
Value for money 7.5 7.5 9 7
Ease of use 7.5 7.5 6 8
ASEAN readiness 6.5 6.5 7 5
API quality 8 8 8 8
Pricing Freemium Freemium Open Source Paid
Free tier Fully free self-hosted with unlimited workflows
Paid from €20/month billed annually for the Starter plan — the stored value uses the wrong currency symbol
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users 200k+ installations
Founded 2019 2021
Maker Jan Oberhauser
Verdict

Trigger.dev solves the boring-but-critical problem underneath most AI features: something has to run a multi-minute agent loop or a batch job reliably, with retries and observability, without a serverless function timing...

Inngest solves a genuinely unglamorous problem well: keeping long-running, multi-step jobs and agent workflows alive through crashes, retries and deploys without you standing up a queue and a state store yourself. Develo...

n8n is a source-available workflow automation platform that connects hundreds of apps via a visual node editor, with the rare ability to self-host for full data control and add custom code where the UI runs out. Its nati...

Modal is a serverless compute platform built for AI and data workloads: you define functions in Python, decorate them, and Modal handles containerization, scheduling, GPUs, and autoscaling. Its strengths are developer ex...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.