STORM (Stanford) vs You.com Research vs ChatGPT Deep Research vs FutureHouse

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

STORM (Stanford) Stanford's open-source research prototype that drafts cited reports Visit You.com Research You.com's Research API — cited multi-step web research, billed per cal... Visit ChatGPT Deep Research OpenAI's cited, multi-step research agent inside ChatGPT Visit FutureHouse Eric-Schmidt-backed nonprofit building AI agents to automate scientifi... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.2 / 10 6.8 / 10 7.8 / 10 7.5 / 10
Capability 7 7 8 —
Value for money 9 6 7 —
Ease of use 5 7.5 8 —
ASEAN readiness 6 6 6 —
API quality n/a 6 5 —
Pricing Open Source Usage_based Freemium Freemium
Free tier Free and open source (MIT); hosted research preview is free with sign-in $100 in free API credit to start; consumer chat closed to new users Free and Go plans include limited deep research; OpenAI publishes no task counts — an in-product counter shows tasks left and resets every 30 days Free public web platform and agents (Crow, Falcon, Owl, Robin) plus a free API tier for researchers.
Paid from — Research API from $12 per 1,000 calls (Lite) Plus $20/mo; Pro 100/200/500 at $100, $200 or $500/mo Not published — the founding Kosmos subscription was withdrawn in May 2026
Has API ✗ ✓ ✗ ✓
Open source ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✗ ✓ ✓
Users — — — —
Founded 2024 2024 2025 2023
Maker Stanford University (Stanford OVAL) — — Sam Rodriques, Andrew White
Verdict

STORM is a clear example of structure-first long-form generation: it surveys perspectives, simulates source-grounded interviews and outlines before drafting, which in Stanford's evaluation produced better-organised and b...

You.com has stopped selling research to individuals: its free plan ended in April 2026, and from 4 August chat closed to new subscribers, leaving the Research API as the product. That API is reasonable infrastructure for...

Deep research is the most consequential agent mode in ChatGPT: give it an open-ended question and it plans, browses and reads for 5 to 30 minutes before handing back a structured, cited report — work that would take an a...

What this is for: Automating literature review, hypothesis generation and multi-step scientific reasoning with citation-grounded AI agents. Who this is for: Academic researchers and scientists in biology, chemistry and...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.