OpenAI Swarm vs ExaWizards exaBase AI
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
OpenAI Swarm
OpenAI's deprecated agent framework, replaced by the Agents SDK
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 4.9 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Open Source | Usage_based |
| Free tier | — | No free plan; a one-week free trial on application |
| Paid from | — | ¥900/user/month excl. tax, plus usage charges on Standard and Premium models |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 50,000+ users across 550 companies (exaBase Generative AI, July 2024) |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Maker | — | Exa Enterprise AI Inc. (ExaWizards Inc., TSE: 4259) |
| Verdict | Swarm was always meant as a teaching tool: a stripped-down demonstration of handing a conversation off between specialized agents without building a full framework around it. The ideas stuck — routines, handoffs, minimal... |
exaBase AI is a sensible buy for a Japanese company that wants several frontier models under one contract, with retrieval over its own files, prompt templates, agents and the controls a compliance team asks for, all proc... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.