Nira vs Material Security
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Nira
Dropbox-owned access governance for Google Drive, Microsoft 365 and Dr...
Visit
|
Material Security
Email, file and OAuth-app security for Google Workspace and Microsoft...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.4 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Custom | Subscription |
| Free tier | — | No free plan; self-serve free trial, or a sales-led proof of concept |
| Paid from | Quoted on request, priced per account (nira.com/pricing returns 404) | From $4/user/mo billed annually, plus Shared Drive fee |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Maker | Dropbox, Inc. | — |
| Verdict | Nira does one job well: it finds every externally shared or public-link file across Google Drive, Microsoft 365 and Dropbox, shows who has access, and lets admins fix thousands of permissions at once, including during of... |
Material Security covers more of the cloud office than a standard inbound filter: email threat detection and an automated phishing-report agent, account-takeover containment, posture checks against CIS and NIST, and on G... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.