Maze vs Entropik (Decode)

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Maze Rapid prototype testing and AI-moderated user research Visit Entropik (Decode) Emotion AI, eye tracking and AI interviews for consumer and UX researc... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.8 / 10 6.3 / 10
Capability — 6
Value for money — 6
Ease of use — 6
ASEAN readiness — 5
API quality — 6
Pricing Freemium Freemium
Free tier Free: 1 study/month, 5 seats, essential prototype testing, surveys, pay-per-use panel credits Free plan: 1 researcher seat, 100 responses a month, up to 3 active studies, emotion AI on 10 responses per study, 5 lifetime creative scans
Paid from Starter $99/month (5 seats, 1 study/month); Enterprise custom Enterprise quoted on request (25 researcher seats; extra seats $1,500/year)
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✗ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — —
Founded 2018 2016
Maker Independent (Maze.design Inc.) —
Verdict

Maze is one of the quickest ways for product teams to test prototypes and gather unmoderated feedback, with strong Figma workflows, automatic reports and now an AI Moderator that runs interviews. The 2026 plan changes ma...

Decode's pitch is consolidation: consumer surveys, AI-moderated interviews, usability tests, eye tracking and predictive creative testing on one platform, with emotion signals layered on top. The new free plan, with 100...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.