Lorikeet vs ExaWizards exaBase
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Lorikeet
Pay-per-resolution AI agent for fintech and healthtech support teams
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.1 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | 2-week free trial (basic fee and usage waived up to a cap); exaBase Empower up to 6-month free trial |
| Paid from | — | From ¥900/user/month + ¥27/1,000 chars (exaBase Generative AI); Studio pricing on request |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 50,000+ users across 550 companies (exaBase Generative AI, July 2024) |
| Founded | — | 2016 |
| Maker | — | ExaWizards Inc. (TSE: 4259) |
| Verdict | Lorikeet's pitch is narrower than most CX agents: instead of chasing deflection-rate leaderboards, it goes after the tickets simpler bots bounce — refund disputes, account changes, compliance-sensitive requests — across... |
exaBase earned Japan's #1 ranking in the Deloitte Tohmatsu MIC FY2023 study across seven categories, and July 2026 brought a rebrand that matches the ambition: exaBase 生成AI is now simply exaBase AI, with autonomous age... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.