Letta vs ExaWizards exaBase
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Letta
Framework and cloud for building stateful AI agents with long-term mem...
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | — | |
| Value for money | — | |
| Ease of use | — | |
| ASEAN readiness | — | |
| API quality | — | |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | Open-source framework (Apache-2.0) is free to self-host. | 2-week free trial (basic fee and usage waived up to a cap); exaBase Empower up to 6-month free trial |
| Paid from | Letta Cloud paid usage-based plans for hosted agents. | From ¥900/user/month + ¥27/1,000 chars (exaBase Generative AI); Studio pricing on request |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 50,000+ users across 550 companies (exaBase Generative AI, July 2024) |
| Founded | 2024 | 2016 |
| Maker | Charles Packer, Sarah Wooders | ExaWizards Inc. (TSE: 4259) |
| Verdict | What this is for: Building agents that keep persistent, self-managed memory and state across long-running interactions. Who this is for: Developers who need agents with durable memory rather than stateless prompt-and-re... |
exaBase earned Japan's #1 ranking in the Deloitte Tohmatsu MIC FY2023 study across seven categories, and July 2026 brought a rebrand that matches the ambition: exaBase 生成AI is now simply exaBase AI, with autonomous age... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.