Glasp vs Liner vs Mem vs Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM)

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Glasp Social web-highlighter with AI summaries Visit Liner AI research search with per-line citations across 200M+ sources Visit Mem AI-native note-taking with automatic organization Visit Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) Source-grounded research notebook with podcast-style summaries Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.7 / 10 6.7 / 10 6.8 / 10 8.3 / 10
Capability 6 7 7 8
Value for money 8 6 6 9
Ease of use 8 8 8 9
ASEAN readiness 6 6 6 7
API quality 2 0 4 3
Pricing Freemium Freemium Freemium Freemium
Free tier
Paid from Free (Standard) tier; paid access bundled into Google AI subscriptions — Plus ~$7.99/mo
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users Reported in the millions of monthly active users in 2026
Founded 2021 2019 2023
Maker Mem Labs
Verdict

Glasp is a social highlighting and knowledge-capture tool: you highlight articles, PDFs and YouTube transcripts in the browser, get AI summaries, and optionally share your highlights with a community, with export into no...

Liner earns its keep on citation traceability — every claim links back to a specific line in a specific source, and Scholar mode narrows that source pool to academic literature with one-click APA/MLA/Chicago export. For...

Mem is an AI-first note-taking app that de-emphasises folders in favour of automatic organisation, smart search, and AI that surfaces related notes and answers questions across your knowledge base. It suits individuals w...

NotebookLM has a genuinely distinct shape among AI tools: it answers from the sources you upload, with inline citations, which keeps hallucination noticeably lower than open-ended chatbots. Audio Overviews — two AI hosts...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.