Adept vs Browser Use

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Adept AI-agent research lab; its site is now an archive Visit Browser Use Open-source library and cloud for AI agents that use web browsers Visit
RECATOOLS Score 4.8 / 10 8.2 / 10
Capability 6 —
Value for money 4 —
Ease of use 4 —
ASEAN readiness 4 —
API quality 3 —
Pricing Unknown Usage_based
Free tier Open weights only: Persimmon-8B (Apache 2.0) and Fuyu-8B (CC BY-NC 4.0) on Hugging Face; no hosted service MIT-licensed library free (bring your own LLM key). Cloud: one-time $15 credit for eligible Google/GitHub/Microsoft signups, no card, 10 concurrent sessions
Paid from Not sold, adept.ai is a blog archive with no sign-up or contact route (Oct 2026) $0.02 per browser-hour, pay as you go (credits from $5, no subscription)
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✗ ✓
Free to use ✗ ✓
Users — —
Founded 2022 2024
Maker — Independent (Browser Use, Inc.)
Verdict

Adept was an early, influential lab for agents that act on software: ACT-1 drove a browser from typed instructions in 2022, and it released Persimmon-8B and Fuyu-8B with open weights.There is nothing to buy today. After...

Browser Use is one of the most popular open-source foundations for AI browser agents: MIT-licensed, model-agnostic and actively developed, with an optional cloud that now bills simply by usage rather than subscription. I...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.