Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph's codebase-aware coding assistant, now sold only to enterp...
Visit
|
Tabnine
Private, self-hostable AI coding assistant, now part of Tricentis
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.5 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | $16K minimum annual contract (Sourcegraph Enterprise, AI credits included) | $39/user/month, annual subscription (last published Sep 2026); now quoted by Tricentis sales |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | 200k+ developers | 1m+ developers |
| Founded | 2023 | 2018 |
| Maker | Sourcegraph | Tricentis |
| Verdict | Cody's strength was always context: answers grounded in symbols and usages from across an organisation's repositories, not just the open file. That still holds for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers working in VS Code, Jet... |
Tabnine's case is deployment control: air-gapped, VPC or on-premises installation, no retention of customer code, models trained on permissively licensed code, and a Context Engine that grounds agents in an organisation'... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.