Pillar Security vs Lakera
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Pillar Security
Discover, red-team and guard every AI agent in one platform
Visit
|
Lakera
Prompt-injection guardrails and AI red teaming, now part of Check Poin...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 6.8 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Custom | Freemium |
| Free tier | No free plan; a free AI risk assessment is offered to qualified organisations | Community plan: $0/month, 10,000 requests a month, prompts up to 8,000 tokens, SaaS hosting with EU data residency, community support |
| Paid from | Quote only (pillar.security has no pricing page) | Not published — Enterprise quoted on request (SaaS or self-hosted) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| Maker | — | Check Point Software Technologies |
| Verdict | Pillar Security suits an enterprise building or buying AI agents in earnest that wants discovery, red-teaming and runtime protection in one product. RedGraph attacks complete agent workflows, findings feed the guardrails... |
Lakera remains one of the best-known runtime guardrails for LLM applications: one API call screens prompts and outputs for prompt injection, jailbreaks and data leakage across more than 100 languages, and a free Communit... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.