Notta vs Otter.ai
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Notta
AI meeting transcription with strong Asian-language support
Visit
|
Otter.ai
Meeting transcription and AI notes
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.3 / 10 | 7.3 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | 300 minutes per month transcription, 3 lifetime audio/video file imports (permanent cap, not monthly), 30-minute cap per conversation |
| Paid from | — | $16.99/month (Pro) |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | — | 35m+ users |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Maker | — | Sam Liang, Yun Fu |
| Verdict | Notta is an AI transcription and meeting-notes tool that records, transcribes, translates, and summarizes audio and video across a wide range of languages, with a meeting bot for Zoom/Teams/Meet and collaboration feature... |
Otter.ai remains the most recognizable AI meeting-assistant, with OtterPilot joining Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet calls to transcribe, diarize speakers, and generate summaries and action items. Real-time English transcri... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.