Make.com vs Pipedream
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Make.com
Visual workflow automation with AI integrations
Visit
|
Pipedream
Developer-first workflow automation with 3,000+ integrations and full...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8.5 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | — | $0 — 100 credits/day, 3 active workflows, 3 connected accounts, unlimited testing |
| Paid from | — | Free tier; paid plans from ~$29/mo, plus Connect and custom Business tiers |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✓ |
| Users | — | 5,000+ customers and tens of thousands of users (per Workday acquisition announcement) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Maker | — | Workday (acquired February 2026) |
| Verdict | Make is one of the strongest no-code/low-code automation platforms, with a visual scenario builder, a huge app catalog, and increasingly deep AI/LLM modules (OpenAI, Anthropic, plus agent-style flows). Its branching, ite... |
Pipedream occupies a strong niche as the most code-friendly hosted automation platform short of building on raw cloud functions. The ability to write real Node.js, Python, Go, or Bash in every step — importing any librar... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.