Litmaps vs Scinapse
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Litmaps
Discover related research with citation-graph mapping
Visit
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7 / 10 | 6.4 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | 3 maps with 200 papers each | — |
| Paid from | $10/month (Researcher) | — |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | 100k+ researchers | — |
| Founded | 2016 | — |
| Maker | University of Otago | — |
| Verdict | Litmaps maps citation networks so you can see how papers connect, spot the seminal ones, and catch new work as it publishes — handy for systematic reviews and expanding out from a handful of seed papers. The bigger 2026... |
Pluto Labs built Scinapse around citation data rather than raw keyword relevance, so a search surfaces the papers a field actually cites and the people behind them, plus author-level analytics. The free tier handles day-... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.