ExaWizards exaBase vs Netomi
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.4 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Enterprise |
| Free tier | 2-week free trial (basic fee and usage waived up to a cap); exaBase Empower up to 6-month free trial | None — enterprise sales-led only; no self-serve or free tier |
| Paid from | From ¥900/user/month + ¥27/1,000 chars (exaBase Generative AI); Studio pricing on request | Enterprise, sales-led, custom annual contracts; no public self-serve pricing |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | 50,000+ users across 550 companies (exaBase Generative AI, July 2024) | Used by large enterprise and Fortune 500 brands; exact customer count undisclosed |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
| Maker | ExaWizards Inc. (TSE: 4259) | Puneet Mehta |
| Verdict | exaBase earned Japan's #1 ranking in the Deloitte Tohmatsu MIC FY2023 study across seven categories, and July 2026 brought a rebrand that matches the ambition: exaBase 生成AI is now simply exaBase AI, with autonomous age... |
Netomi backs up its enterprise pitch with real scale: 40,000+ concurrent requests per second for DraftKings, production deployments at United Airlines and MetLife, and a governance layer built for regulated industries. T... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.