Dust vs Sana vs Cassidy AI vs Glean

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Dust Build custom AI assistants for your team Visit Sana AI work assistant unifying knowledge across SaaS tools Visit Cassidy AI AI assistants grounded in your company knowledge base Visit Glean Enterprise search and AI assistant for work Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.4 / 10 7.4 / 10 6.7 / 10 7.8 / 10
Capability 8 8 7 9
Value for money 7 6 6 6
Ease of use 6 7 7 6
ASEAN readiness 6 6 5 6
API quality 7 6 6 7
Pricing Freemium Enterprise Freemium Enterprise
Free tier
Paid from Enterprise custom; reported ~$50-75/user/month, ~100-seat minimum
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users $300M ARR as of May 2026 (customer count not officially disclosed
Founded 2022 2016 2019
Maker
Verdict

Dust is one of the stronger platforms for building custom AI agents over a company's own knowledge and tools — connect Notion, Slack, GitHub, Google Drive, Salesforce and more, then assemble model-agnostic agents (across...

Sana is a polished enterprise AI platform for building no-code agents grounded in company knowledge, with strong multimodal retrieval across documents, recordings and CRM data, 100+ connectors and a serious security post...

Cassidy's differentiator is the knowledge base sitting under everything. It syncs Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Notion, and Confluence in near real time, so assistants answer from current company data instead of a...

Glean is a leading enterprise work-AI platform: it indexes a company's SaaS apps (email, docs, tickets, chat, code) into a permissions-aware search and assistant, with an agent-building layer on top. Its strengths are co...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.