DeepSeek vs Kimi 月之暗面

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

DeepSeek Hangzhou lab shipping MIT-licensed V4 models and a very cheap API Visit Kimi 月之暗面 Moonshot AI's assistant and open-weight K3 model with a 1M-token conte... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 8.2 / 10 7.3 / 10
Capability 9 8
Value for money 10 8
Ease of use 7 6.5
ASEAN readiness 5 4.5
API quality 8 6
Pricing Open Source Freemium
Free tier Free chat on the web and in the app; MIT-licensed open weights to self-host Adagio free plan: 1 concurrent agent task, 2 scheduled tasks, 2 projects and 500MB of project storage
Paid from $0.15 per 1M input tokens (deepseek-flash, cache miss, off-peak); $0.30 at peak $19/month (Plus, or $15/month billed annually); API from $0.95 in and $4.00 out per M tokens
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ ✗
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users ~130M monthly active users (late 2025) 36M+ MAU (as of late 2024)
Founded 2023 2023
Maker High-Flyer Moonshot AI (月之暗面)
Verdict

DeepSeek remains the price benchmark for capable models: V4.1-Flash costs $0.15 to $0.30 per million input tokens and V4-Pro under $4 per million output at peak, both with 1M-token context, and the weights are MIT-licens...

Kimi earns its place on capability and price. K3 is the largest open-weight model available, with a one-million-token context and weights you can run yourself under a licence that only bites on very large commercial user...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.