Consensus vs Perplexity Pages
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Consensus
AI search engine that shows what the research says
Visit
|
Perplexity Pages
Perplexity's cited research pages, retired pending a promised rebuild
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.3 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Subscription |
| Free tier | Basic paper search, 10 Pro messages and up to 3 Deep reviews a month | — |
| Paid from | Pro $12/mo billed annually ($20 monthly); Deep $45/mo annually ($65 monthly) | Not available on any Perplexity plan while the feature is retired |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✗ |
| Users | 500k+ users | Available to all Perplexity users |
| Founded | 2021 | 2024 |
| Maker | Eric Olson, Christian Salem | Perplexity AI |
| Verdict | Consensus answers research questions from academic literature rather than the open web: a cited synthesis, natural-language filters for population, design and time frame, and a Consensus Meter showing how far studies agr... |
Pages was a good idea: it turned Perplexity's cited research into an editable, shareable article for explainers and briefings. It cannot be used today. Perplexity retired page creation and has said since at least Septemb... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.