Connected Papers vs Litmaps vs Research Rabbit vs Scinapse

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Connected Papers Visual exploration of related academic papers Visit Litmaps Discover related research with citation-graph mapping Visit Research Rabbit Visual citation-network mapper for papers — still free, now has RR+. Visit Scinapse Citation-grounded academic search from Seoul's Pluto Labs Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.4 / 10 7 / 10 7.7 / 10 6.4 / 10
Capability 7 7 7.5 6
Value for money 7 7 9 7
Ease of use 9 7 7.5 7
ASEAN readiness 6 6 6.5 7
API quality 2 0 0 4
Pricing Freemium Freemium Free Freemium
Free tier 3 maps with 200 papers each Full access for free
Paid from $10/month (Researcher)
Has API
Open source
Free to use
Users 100k+ researchers 1m+ researchers
Founded 2019 2016 2021
Maker University of Otago Riley Davis, Timothy Chang
Verdict

Connected Papers is a beautifully simple research tool: enter one paper and it generates a visual graph of similar work based on citation/co-citation similarity, making it easy to discover prior, derivative and seminal p...

Litmaps maps citation networks so you can see how papers connect, spot the seminal ones, and catch new work as it publishes — handy for systematic reviews and expanding out from a handful of seed papers. The bigger 2026...

Research Rabbit maps citation networks, co-authorship, and topic timelines around any paper, and for years operated as a fully free public good for researchers. That changed on October 30, 2025: a redesign kept the core...

Pluto Labs built Scinapse around citation data rather than raw keyword relevance, so a search surfaces the papers a field actually cites and the people behind them, plus author-level analytics. The free tier handles day-...

Full review → Full review → Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.