CodeFuse 蚂蚁CodeFuse vs Qwen Code

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

CodeFuse 蚂蚁CodeFuse Ant Group's open code models, training frameworks and AI coding tools Visit Qwen Code Alibaba's open-source coding agent for terminal, IDE and desktop Visit
RECATOOLS Score 6.4 / 10 7.7 / 10
Capability 7 8
Value for money 8 9
Ease of use 4 6
ASEAN readiness 5 7
API quality 5 7
Pricing Open Source Open Source
Free tier Open-source code (Apache-2.0) and model weights (Apache-2.0 or the CodeFuse Community License) are free to self-host Apache-2.0 CLI is free to install and use; you supply the model (own API key or local Ollama/vLLM). The free Qwen OAuth tier ended 15 Apr 2026
Paid from — CLI free, model access e.g. Alibaba Coding Plan Pro at $50/month or your own API key
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ ✓
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — —
Founded 2023 2025
Maker Ant Group Alibaba Group (Qwen team)
Verdict

CodeFuse is valuable as a research resource: open code models, the MFTCoder multi-task fine-tuning framework, evaluation sets and newer embedding models from one of China's largest engineering organisations.It is not a m...

Qwen Code is now a broad, fast-moving agent rather than a Gemini CLI fork: sub-agents, agent teams, MCP, hooks, IDE plugins, a desktop app and SDKs, released almost daily under Apache-2.0. You can point it at Qwen, DeepS...

Full review → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.