Crush vs Plandex
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
|
|
Plandex
Open-source terminal coding agent — cloud service wound down
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.5 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Open Source | Open Source |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | — | 2024 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Crush carries Charm's design pedigree (Bubble Tea, Gum, Glow) into agentic coding, and it shows — reviewers consistently call it the best-looking TUI in the category. LSP integration means it reasons about actual functio... |
Plandex's core idea still holds up: a terminal agent that plans a multi-step task, shows you a cumulative diff before anything touches disk, and lets you branch or roll back a plan like a git history. For a 20-30 file re... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.