Baking Pan Size Converter

Share:

Baking pan size converter. Enter the tin a recipe was written for and the tin you have (round, square or rectangular, each in cm or inches) to get the factor that keeps the batter as deep as the recipe intended. Add both depths to compare how much each tin holds. Runs in your browser.

RT-COK-008 · Cooking & Food
Your browser is too old for this tool’s interactive features. Please update to Safari 13.1, Chrome or Edge 80, Firefox 74 or newer.

Baking Pan Size Converter

Recipe’s pan

Your pan

Scale every ingredient by
—
📅 Research current as of 15 Oct 2026 · Sources: Geometry (π r², side², length × width; 1 in = 2.54 cm). Guidance attributed to Joy of Baking, King Arthur (18 Aug 2025), Baker Gatherer (28 Jan 2026), olive magazine, Ask Nigella and Wilton’s cake serving chart and wedding cake guide
Standards, published formulas, and reference data are revised over time — check against a current authoritative source before relying on these figures.
Advertisement
After tool · AD-W1Responsive

How to Use the Baking Pan Converter

Enter the recipe’s pan

Set its shape, unit and size. Measure inside edge to inside edge.

Enter your pan

Set the shape, unit and size of the pan you want to use. The two pans can be in different units.

Add both depths

Optional, but it is the only way to see whether the batter fits: the calculator compares capacities and shows how full your pan will be.

Scale the recipe

Multiply every ingredient by the factor shown.

Advertisement
After how-to · AD-W2Responsive

Swapping Baking Pans Without Ruining the Recipe

The recipe calls for a tin you do not own, and the one in the cupboard is a different size or shape. Two separate questions decide whether the swap works. The first is how much batter to make, and the answer is the ratio of the two tins’ base areas: scale every ingredient by it and the batter stands as deep in your tin as the recipe intended. Joy of Baking puts it as keeping “the same batter depth … by keeping the same pan area”. The second question is whether that batter fits, and area cannot answer it. That depends on how deep each tin is, which is why the calculator asks for depth as well.

Area grows with the square of the width, so a tin that looks only a little wider needs much more batter. At the same depth a 9-inch round holds about 27% more than an 8-inch round, and a square has 27% more base than a round of the same width. That is why olive magazine and Baker Gatherer step a round tin down to the next square size, a 20 cm round to an 18 cm square. Depth is where same-area swaps go wrong. King Arthur gives the case of a 9 × 3 inch springform recipe baked in a 9 × 2 inch round: the same base, about 13 cups of capacity against 8.8. Enter both depths and the calculator shows each tin’s capacity and how far up your tin the batter will reach. Its capacities assume straight sides; Bake or Break suggests measuring a sloped tin by filling it with water instead.

How the bake changes is where the sources part ways, and the calculator does not pick a side. Joy of Baking says a shallower batter wants a shorter time and a slightly hotter oven, and a deeper one a longer time and a slightly cooler oven. Baker Gatherer goes the other way for a batter spread thinner: drop the temperature by 10°C and start checking 10 minutes early. olive magazine keeps the temperature the same for a round-to-square swap. Wilton bakes its largest pans at 325°F rather than 350°F. King Arthur suggests checking 10 to 15 minutes early in a larger pan and gives no temperature change. On how full to fill a tin they also differ: King Arthur and Baker Gatherer say no more than two-thirds, Wilton’s wedding cake guide says half to two-thirds and only half for 3 inch deep pans, and Ask Nigella says roughly half way up the side. Everything is computed in your browser from simple geometry, so nothing you enter leaves your device.

Base area decides how deep the batter sits. The tin’s depth decides whether it fits.

A nine-inch round holds 27% more than an eight

01

Base area sets how deep the batter sits; the tin’s depth sets whether it fits.

02

At the same depth a 9-inch round holds ~27% more than an 8-inch round (81 ÷ 64).

03

Round area = π × radius²; square = side²; rectangle = length × width.

04

A square has 27% more base than a round of the same width (4 ÷ π).

05

A 20 cm round (314 cm²) and an 18 cm square (324 cm²) are within 3%.

06

Scale every ingredient by the same factor.

07

Fill ceilings differ: two-thirds (King Arthur, Baker Gatherer), half for Wilton’s 3-inch pans.

08

Sources disagree on changing oven temperature when batter depth changes.

09

Sloped tins hold less than straight-sided maths says; water measures them.

10

This calculator runs in your browser — nothing is uploaded.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Work out the base area of the pan the recipe was written for and of the pan you want to use, then divide the new area by the original. Multiply every ingredient by that factor and the batter stands as deep in your pan as it did in the recipe’s. The calculator does the arithmetic, so a factor of 1.27, for example, means 27% more of everything.
  • Batter spreads across the bottom of the pan, so the amount needed to reach a given depth depends on the base area, which grows with the square of the width. Keeping the depth the same is what keeps the bake similar: Joy of Baking calls the ideal substitution one that keeps the same batter depth by keeping the same pan area. Volume, the pan’s capacity, answers a different question: whether that batter fits.
  • Enter both pans’ depths. The calculator then shows each pan’s straight-sided capacity to the brim and how far up your pan the scaled batter will sit. A 9 × 3 inch springform recipe moved into a 9 × 2 inch round has the same base area, so the factor is 1.00, but the batter sits one and a half times as high up the shallower pan: a springform filled halfway becomes a round filled three-quarters. Fill ceilings vary by source: King Arthur and Baker Gatherer say no more than two-thirds, Wilton says half to two-thirds and only half for 3 inch deep pans, and Nigella says roughly half way.
  • A round pan’s area is π times the radius squared, where the radius is half the diameter you enter. A square pan’s area is its side times itself, and a rectangular pan’s is its length times its width. Measure inside edge to inside edge, as Joy of Baking advises, and hold the ruler straight up for the depth.
  • Yes. A square has 4 ÷ π, about 27%, more base than a round of the same width, which is why UK and Australian charts step down about one size: olive magazine pairs a 20 cm round with an 18 cm square and a 23 cm round with a 20 cm square. The calculator gives the exact factor for any pair you enter.
  • Yes. Each pan has its own unit, so a recipe written for a 9 inch round can be compared with an 18 cm square. Switching a pan’s unit converts the numbers already typed (1 inch = 2.54 cm). Areas are shown in each pan’s own unit, and the factor is worked out in square centimetres so the units cancel.
  • The sources we read disagree, and the calculator does not choose for you. Joy of Baking says to raise the temperature slightly and shorten the time for a shallower batter, and lower it slightly and lengthen the time for a deeper one. Baker Gatherer goes the other way for a batter spread thinner: drop it by 10°C and start checking 10 minutes early. olive magazine says to keep it the same when moving from a round to a square tin. Wilton bakes its largest pans at 325°F rather than 350°F. King Arthur gives no temperature change and suggests checking 10 to 15 minutes early in a larger pan.
  • For loaf pans, enter the inside length, width and depth as a rectangle and compare capacities rather than relying on area alone. Bundt and tube pans are not shapes the calculator models; measure each one by filling it with water to the brim and compare the amounts, which also catches sloped sides.
  • Scaling keeps the ingredient ratios identical, so the batter is the same; what changes is the bake when the depth in the pan changes. For a big change in depth, a pan closer in proportion, or splitting the batter across two pans, keeps you nearer the recipe.
  • Completely free, with no account or usage limit. It runs entirely in your browser, collects no data, and works offline once the page has loaded.

Method & sources

How it computes

Base area: round = π × (diameter ÷ 2)², square = side², rectangle = length × width, each in its own unit and converted to cm² (1 in = 2.54 cm). Scale = your pan's area ÷ the recipe pan's, which keeps batter depth (Joy of Baking). With both depths: straight-sided brim capacity = area × depth in ml, and the scaled batter sits recipe depth ÷ your depth as high. Missing, zero or negative sizes are refused.

What this tool implements

  • Scaling by base area keeps the batter as deep as the recipe intended; Joy of Baking: "The ideal pan substitution is one that keeps the same batter depth as in the original recipe, by keeping the same pan area." Capacity (whether it fits) is a separate output that needs both depths.
  • Capacities are straight-sided and to the brim. Sloped tins hold less; the page says so and points to the water test (Bake or Break).
  • Oven temperature: sources disagree and the page attributes each without choosing — Joy of Baking (raise slightly for shallower, lower for deeper), Baker Gatherer (drop 10°C when spread thin), olive magazine (keep it for round to square), Wilton (325°F instead of 350°F for its largest pans), King Arthur (check 10 to 15 minutes early in a larger pan, no temperature change).
  • Fill ceilings attributed: King Arthur and Baker Gatherer two-thirds; Wilton half to two-thirds, half for 3 in deep pans; Nigella roughly half way.
  • Corrected 2026-10-15: a square used a hidden stale width (a 10 in square read 80 in²); a blank rectangle width became a square; zero gave "x 0" and negatives were squared; one unit toggle relabelled both pans without converting; "keep the oven temperature the same" was stated as a rule.

Sources

Advertisement
Pre-footer · AD-W3 728 × 90