Socket vs Endor Labs
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Socket
Catches malicious open-source packages by behaviour, before they merge
Visit
|
Endor Labs
Reachability-based application security for code written by people and...
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | Free: unlimited developers and repos, 1,000 scans a month, 500 API calls an hour, AI analysis and malware blocking; free for open source | Developer tier: AURI scanning in AI code editors with no account, run locally; no UI, policies or scan history |
| Paid from | $25/developer/month billed monthly (Team, minimum 5 developers), up to 20% off yearly | Quoted on request (Core and Pro, seat-based per contributing developer) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Socket fills the gap CVE scanners leave: it reads package behaviour, so a freshly published malicious version can be blocked before anyone has written an advisory. AI analysis and malware blocking are on the free plan, t... |
Endor Labs is built around one useful idea, reachability: it checks whether the vulnerable function in a dependency is ever called, so a security team works a short list of exploitable findings instead of every CVE. It h... |
| Full review → | Full review → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.