Rogo vs Hebbia
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Rogo
Agentic AI platform for investment banks, PE and asset managers
Visit
|
Hebbia
AI analysis platform for investment, banking and legal teams
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 7.2 / 10 | 7.6 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Free tier | — | — |
| Paid from | About $3,300/seat/year (Sacra estimate) — Rogo publishes no price, sales-led via demo | Custom quote only (Hebbia publishes no price) |
| Has API | ✗ | ✗ |
| Open source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free to use | ✗ | ✗ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2022 | 2020 |
| Maker | — | — |
| Verdict | Rogo has raised heavily, including $160M in April 2026 led by Kleiner Perkins at a reported $2B valuation, and nine global banks now sit on its cap table. Its product has moved from a finance chatbot to model-agnostic or... |
Hebbia is built for institutions that read documents at volume. Matrix runs structured questions across large document sets with every answer linked to its source, Max turns firm data into slides, reports and models, and... |
| Full review → | Directory listing → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.