Rasa vs LangChain

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Rasa Self-hosted agent platform with deterministic flows around LLMs Visit LangChain MIT-licensed framework for building LLM agents in Python and JavaScrip... Visit
RECATOOLS Score 7.3 / 10 8.1 / 10
Capability 8 9
Value for money 8 8
Ease of use 4 6
ASEAN readiness 6 6
API quality 8 8
Pricing Freemium Open Source
Free tier Free Developer Edition licence: one bot per company, up to 1,000 external or 100 internal conversations a month LangChain, LangGraph and deepagents are free under MIT; LangSmith Developer is free for 1 seat with 5k base traces a month
Paid from Enterprise quoted on request $39/seat/month (LangSmith Plus, 10k base traces included), then usage
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ ✓
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users 50000+ developers 1m+ developers
Founded 2016 2022
Maker Alan Nichol, Alex Weidauer LangChain Inc.
Verdict

Rasa suits teams that must own their conversational stack: self-hosted deployment, deterministic flows for the steps that cannot go wrong, and enterprise controls such as SSO, role-based access and PII handling. The Mant...

LangChain is the quickest way to get an agent working across many model providers, and since 1.0 it is a steadier dependency: one create_agent entry point, LangGraph's durable runtime underneath, frequent releases and a...

Directory listing → Full review →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.