Qdrant vs Weaviate

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.

Qdrant Rust vector search engine built for filtering-heavy AI workloads Visit Weaviate Open-source vector database with hybrid search built in Visit
RECATOOLS Score 8.7 / 10 8 / 10
Capability 9 8
Value for money 9 8
Ease of use 6 6
ASEAN readiness 6 7
API quality 9 9
Pricing Open Source Open Source
Free tier Free forever cluster: 1 node, 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk (~1M 768-dim vectors per docs), no card; suspended after 1 week idle. Self-hosted engine free (Apache-2.0) Always-free Weaviate Cloud sandbox (100,000 objects, 1 GB memory, 10 GB disk, 1 collection); BSD-3-Clause core free to self-host
Paid from Standard: usage-based, billed hourly on vCPU, RAM, disk and backups Flex from $45/mo pay-as-you-go; Premium prepaid contract, minimum from $400/mo
Has API ✓ ✓
Open source ✓ ✓
Free to use ✓ ✓
Users — —
Founded 2021 2019
Maker Independent (Qdrant Solutions GmbH) —
Verdict

Qdrant is one of the strongest open-source vector databases, especially where search has to be combined with complex filters, and its free cloud cluster and permissive licence make it easy to start. Its performance claim...

Weaviate pairs vector similarity with BM25 keyword search in a single query, and its built-in vectorizer modules mean you are not always wiring your own embedding pipeline. G2 reviewers rate it 4.4 out of 5 across 49 rev...

Full review → Directory listing →
← Back to AI Directory

Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.