Qdrant vs Chroma
A side-by-side look at scores, pricing and features — with RECATOOLS' ASEAN-aware verdict for each.
Qdrant
Rust vector search engine built for filtering-heavy AI workloads
Visit
|
Chroma
Simple open-source vector and full-text search, from laptop to cloud
Visit
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RECATOOLS Score | 8.7 / 10 | 7.5 / 10 |
| Capability | ||
| Value for money | ||
| Ease of use | ||
| ASEAN readiness | ||
| API quality | ||
| Pricing | Open Source | Open Source |
| Free tier | Free forever cluster: 1 node, 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk (~1M 768-dim vectors per docs), no card; suspended after 1 week idle. Self-hosted engine free (Apache-2.0) | Open-source core free under Apache 2.0. Chroma Cloud Starter $0 + usage with $5 free credits, 10 databases, 10 team members |
| Paid from | Standard: usage-based, billed hourly on vCPU, RAM, disk and backups | Chroma Cloud Team $250/mo + usage |
| Has API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free to use | ✓ | ✓ |
| Users | — | — |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Maker | Independent (Qdrant Solutions GmbH) | Independent (Chroma Inc.) |
| Verdict | Qdrant is one of the strongest open-source vector databases, especially where search has to be combined with complex filters, and its free cloud cluster and permissive licence make it easy to start. Its performance claim... |
Chroma remains the friendliest way to add vector search to an AI app, with a smooth path from an embedded library to a managed cloud that now has enterprise features such as private networking and an EU region. Its own f... |
| Full review → | Directory listing → |
← Back to AI Directory
Comparisons cover up to 4 tools. Scores are RECATOOLS editorial assessments; verify current pricing on each vendor's site.